Help support TMP


"Optio: Republican Rome vs Gaul" Topic


1 Post

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Battle Reports Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Grade My Gauls

At last! Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finally paints the first of his Gauls...


Featured Workbench Article

Painting the Castle Kits Egyptian Temple Entrance

Minidragon Fezian finishes his Temple project by painting the kit he previously assembled.


Featured Profile Article

June Contest Winner: Hoplite Baggage Vignette

Yesthatphil is the winner of the June 2015 contest with this wonderful entry.


Current Poll


1,198 hits since 1 Jun 2022
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Bolingar01 Jun 2022 1:20 a.m. PST

Optio game at the Durban gaming club last Saturday between fellow clubmember Noel and myself. Mid-republican Roman vs Gallic. The Romans (Noel) had 2 legions plus cavalry (I decided on a smaller game so as not to overburden Noel) for a total of 32 bases. The Gauls (yours truly) had plenty of warband plus a unit of Gaesati and Soldurii, 2 units of chariots and a good dose of cavalry. 48 bases in total.

Gaul deployed on a long slope, putting the infantry in two lines. First line had the Soldurii unit, second the Gaesati. Cavalry and chariots on the flanks. The idea was to weaken the Roman infantry with the first line, forcing them to do line exchanges, and once the first line routed (which was inevitable), finish off the legions with the second line. The cavalry and chariots would take their chances against the Roman cavalry on the flanks.

Rome deployed on a long hill and a round hill. Her plan was simple: sit tight on the high ground and let the Gauls come to the legions, and then outfight them. The cavalry would content themselves with being flank guards for the infantry who would win the battle.

Things went pretty much Rome's way. An attempt to outflank the Roman right cavalry wing with a chariot unit failed, and the Gallic cavalry on the Gallic right were routed in short order, thanks the Roman position on the slope. In the centre the legions outfought the first Gallic line (though one legion unit came close to routing). Gaul had kept her second line well back so as not to get caught up in the rout of the first line, but when the first line routed, it caused the Gallic left flank cavalry to rout (morale test for all units 2 battlefield squares or less away from a routed unit). The routing cavalry were close enough to the second line to cause it to rout in turn. I should have either kept the cavalry back or sent them further forward. Game over. Pretty historical I suppose though a disappointing performance by the Gauls.

Here is the game at the end: the first Gallic line is largely gone and the second (on the right) is about to take early military retirement. The Romans made excellent use of terrain.

On reflection the Gallic morale was a tad fragile. Troops have a 'courage' classification: resolute, average and brittle. The better their courage the more of their units must rout before they themselves fail the morale test. In this game the Gauls were average. Next time I'll make them resolute.


Below, the second Gallic line (on the right) is about to take early military retirement. The first line has largely routed already.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.