
"Flashing Steel Ranged Combat Question" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board Back to the Swashbuckling Message Board Back to the Pirates Message Board
Areas of InterestRenaissance 18th Century Napoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Command figures for the 1410 Teutonics.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
codiver | 31 Mar 2022 8:27 a.m. PST |
A buddy of mine and I are planning on trying Flashing Steel this weekend. Reading the rules, I noticed something that doesn't seem to make sense in the Ranged Combat section: the second entry in the Ranged Combat Modifiers table is "Firing and Moving in same Action -1". I don't understand this. It is an action to move, and it is an action to fire. Separate actions. So how do you fire and move in the same action? Dave |
codiver | 31 Mar 2022 8:31 a.m. PST |
Thought of this after I posted: does it mean "same Activation"? |
Andrew Walters | 31 Mar 2022 9:39 a.m. PST |
"Activation" and "Action" are different things. The activation is when you nominate a figure, decide on a number of dice, and roll. Then, that figure takes as many actions as you had successes on the die roll. So you could activate a figure, roll two dice, get two successes and thus two actions. If you move and make a ranged attack or vice versa the attack will have a -1 penalty. |
codiver | 31 Mar 2022 12:27 p.m. PST |
Andrew, Thanks for the response. I agree with you completely that "Activation" and "Action" are different. I also agree with your second statement. However, in my opinion, your third statement demonstrates the modifier should be worded "same Activation", as I thought of after my original post. In your example, one action is Move, one is Ranged Attack. There is no single Move and Ranged Attack ACTION. Dave |
Andrew Walters | 31 Mar 2022 12:43 p.m. PST |
Ah, I apologize, I didn't read your question closely enough. I looked it over again and can think of only two explanations: 1 – The combat modifier should apply to Activations even though it says "Action", ie it's a type. 2- The Move action says: "inside a Move the model may perform one other activity that may require a voluntary Quality check or a Swashbuckling check." I would normally read that to mean *not* an attack, since that doesn't require a Quality or Swashbuckling check but a combat die roll. That's for knocking something over as you move or whatever. But a much, much more serious typo could mean that this phrase means you can attack while actually moving. That's kind of ridiculous, but it's the only other way I can explain the wording. So I think it's number one, that's how we always played it. I looked for a FAQ for Flashing Steel or Song of B&H (which has pretty much the same rules here). Didn't find one, though people said Andreas answers questions on Facebook.
|
Grattan54  | 31 Mar 2022 7:19 p.m. PST |
I would says, having played the system many times, that it means activation and not actions. |
|