"We need a Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft as soon" Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article Adam8472  takes inspiration from Doctor Who.
Featured Profile Article What if you want to game something too controversial or distasteful to put on the tabletop?
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
| Tango01 | 03 Feb 2022 9:18 p.m. PST |
… as possible
"As the Army emerges from twenty years of counter insurgency operations, it is refocusing its doctrine and warfighting capabilities to address the threats posed by peer adversaries in the European and Pacific theatres — modernizing its equipment and fielding new capabilities to soldiers.
The Army's Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft is one of those transformational modernization programs that will provide a game-changing capability the Army does not have today. The FLRAA program will provide the Army with the ability to fly faster, go farther and potentially carry more payload than traditional helicopters today, specifically the UH-60 Black Hawk it looks to replace. This is a game changer not only for the aviators, but for the ground force commanders…"
Main page link Armand |
| microgeorge | 04 Feb 2022 9:03 p.m. PST |
My choice would be the V-280. Superior speed and range. Besides, I don't know if Sikorsky has solved the vibration issues associated with their rotor configuration. |
|
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/mco/NT2IBGCCXNEVFJWSB66UWZABNA.jpg "picture")