"Comparison of Expeditionary Force ACW with Armies in Plastic" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Plastic Figures Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article Looking for a way to mark explosions or fire?
Featured Workbench Article Laconia Hobbies shows us how it is done.
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
| Major B | 17 Jan 2022 8:45 a.m. PST |
Does anyone have a side-by-side comparison of Expeditionary Force ACW 54mm with Armies in Plastic ACW? I am planning on ordering figures with the intent of using any extra heads on my AIP figures (havelocks, kepis) but want to see if they are compatible. |
| Major B | 17 Jan 2022 8:46 a.m. PST |
Does anyone have a side-by-side comparison of Expeditionary Force ACW 54mm with Armies in Plastic ACW? I am planning on ordering figures with the intent of using any extra heads on my AIP figures (havelocks, kepis) but want to see if they are compatible. |
| Green Tiger | 18 Jan 2022 9:19 a.m. PST |
I can't vouch for the ACW figs but I bought some (very nice) HYW knights and they were completely unusable – towered over my existing figures. |
Doug MSC  | 18 Jan 2022 10:26 a.m. PST |
I have many of the Expeditionary Force Figures. They are great and are hard plastic not soft. The medieval figures are 60mm but the ACW figures are 54mm. I don't know how they would match up with the Armies in plastic. |
| dBerczerk | 20 Jan 2022 8:51 a.m. PST |
I have several sets of the Expeditionary Force 54mm American Civil War figures. They match up better with the old Marx ACW figures than with the slightly larger Armies in Plastic ACW figures, but once painted, the minor difference becomes negligible. |
|
tells something about herself.