"Mexican-American War: Best Battle for Wargaming?" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Mexican-American Wars Message Board
Action Log
13 Aug 2022 7:02 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill
- Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board
Areas of Interest19th Century
World War One
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article Reader Michael Thompson sends in these Back of Beyond photos from the club where he games.
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 04 Dec 2021 8:38 p.m. PST |
Which battle from the Mexican-American War makes the best game on the miniature wargaming tabletop? |
| mumbasa | 04 Dec 2021 8:54 p.m. PST |
Palo Alto is my favorite. |
| Prince Alberts Revenge | 04 Dec 2021 9:06 p.m. PST |
Palo Alto definitely. When I embarked on my Mexican-American War project, I opted for Palo Alto. Its smallish, fairly even and the Mexicans provide lots of colorful cavalry. Its essentially the same armies for Resaca de la Palma and gives good cores for the other, bigger battles. |
| David Grech | 05 Dec 2021 5:47 a.m. PST |
we enjoyed doing the Palo alto scenario especially painting the figures .full report here link |
| Rich Bliss | 05 Dec 2021 8:06 a.m. PST |
Another vote for Palo Alto |
rvandusen  | 06 Dec 2021 5:22 a.m. PST |
Palo Alto for the win. I recall the feature in that old Time-Life book. Too bad about Major Ringgold, and all of the fallen on both sides. |
 The Virtual Armchair General  | 06 Dec 2021 11:38 a.m. PST |
At the risk of sharing a hive mind, Palo Alto, pretty much has to be the best of the historical actions for all reasons cited, plus at least one not yet cited. The Mexican Army of The North was spoiling for a fight, an opportunity to put the "bullying Yanquis" in their place. With all the profound failings of the Mexican armies in general acknowledged (even though that day theirs was effectively a 2:1 numerical edge), they still had the best single advantage any army can have--they believed they would win. That they didn't might almost be attributed solely to the decision of General Arista to stand and make the enemy come to him. What he couldn't have anticipated was the astonishing revolution in field artillery tactics as developed by Ringgold, against which "standing firm" was actually suicidal. Any set of rules which gives the Mexicans the initial moral advantage--fully equal to the Yanquis--from the beginning, and properly represents the actual means of Ringgold's artillery tactics, is going to give a tremendous battle and a chance for history to be changed. TVAG |
|
