Help support TMP

"The Great “What Ifs” of the American Civil War: Historians" Topic

10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the ACW Media Message Board

Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article

Featured Link

Featured Ruleset

Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Artillery Limber

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian completes his initial Union force in 1:72nd scale.

Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.

919 hits since 18 Oct 2021
©1994-2023 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

TMP logo


Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP19 Oct 2021 9:09 p.m. PST

… Tackle the Conflict's Most Intriguing Possibilities

""What If . . . ?" Every Civil War armchair general asks the question. Possibilities unfold. Disappointments vanish. Imaginations soar. More questions arise. "What if . . ." can be more than an exercise in wistful fantasy. A serious inquiry sparks rigorous exploration, demands critical thinking, and unlocks important insights.

The Great "What Ifs" of the American Civil War: Historians Tackle the Conflict's Most Intriguing Possibilities is a collection of fourteen essays by the historians at Emerging Civil War, and includes a Foreword by acclaimed alternate history writer Peter G. Tsouras…"
Main page


John the OFM19 Oct 2021 10:34 p.m. PST

Mine is "What if Davis called Lincoln's bluff and didn't fire on Fort Sumter."

Wackmole920 Oct 2021 7:15 a.m. PST

I would go with MacCellen attack with all 3 wings of his army at Antietam and crushes lee's army in detail. The war is over, Unfortuernly it would lead to big mac being president.

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP20 Oct 2021 7:53 a.m. PST

He also edited "Dixie Victorious" which is great (if you like that kind of thing. I do, very much, but many think it waste of time and a fantasy exercise).

Legionarius20 Oct 2021 3:42 p.m. PST

Historical events have multiple causes and multiple consequences. Reasoning from one change in a linear fashion would not yield a necessarily different effect. This is the " for want of a nail" fallacy. Yes you can dream of different outcomes but no amount of reasoning makes them more likely.

John the OFM20 Oct 2021 5:35 p.m. PST

The only likely events are those that actually happened.

forrester21 Oct 2021 1:44 p.m. PST

All this sort of thing hasn't done Harry Turtledove any harm.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP21 Oct 2021 2:33 p.m. PST



John Simmons23 Oct 2021 6:14 p.m. PST

At Antietam, MAC did attack with all three wings.

Brechtel198 Supporting Member of TMP24 Oct 2021 3:20 a.m. PST

Regarding Dixie Victorious, I have found that it is difficult to write 'alternate history' in that you have to research the subject being written about thoroughly and then fit in the 'alternate' material in order to make it at least believable.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.