"SURVEY -Tacking a Square-Rigged AoS Warship" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Age of Sail Message Board
Areas of InterestRenaissance 18th Century Napoleonic 19th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleTod gives us another look at his "old school" Boxer Rebellion figures.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile ArticleThe gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.
|
Blutarski | 14 Sep 2021 11:27 a.m. PST |
I'm interested to understand the general opinion among AoS gamers as to the time required (number of turns x time unit represented) to tack a frigate, a two-decker, a three-decker under various weather conditions … say: light, moderate, fresh winds. Look forward to your responses and coments. B |
pvernon | 14 Sep 2021 4:11 p.m. PST |
I would not tack a square rigged ship unless I had a very experienced crew, too easy to go into irons. I would wear the ship, easy to do and usually faster. |
Ed Mohrmann | 14 Sep 2021 9:37 p.m. PST |
Blutarski, would sea state, crew quality and ship's readiness (rigging, etc) not enter in to the decision ? |
79thPA | 15 Sep 2021 6:46 a.m. PST |
This might be of interest: link |
Blutarski | 15 Sep 2021 8:07 a.m. PST |
Good day, Professor Mohrmann. You are IMO correct on all counts. The ideal scenario would be a good breeze, smooth seas, ship in good repair, and competent officers and crew. Assuming that to be the case, the question remains – what do we think would be the typical real-world time required to tack ship? Jean Boudriot ("74 Gun Ship") mentioned as much as 15 minutes might be required to tack a circa-1780 three-decker. B |
Blutarski | 15 Sep 2021 8:31 a.m. PST |
Hi pvernon, I don't believe that tacking ship was an intrinsically dangerous maneuver under normal conditions of wind and sea; I certainly have never read of it being considered as such in the historical literature. I do agree that wearing shp was, as a general rule, easier (and safer in connection with a formation maneuver. But even Wearing Ship (as I understand it) required a certain degree of caution. Once headed Before the Wind and continuing the turn onto the new tack, the rudder would often have to be eased up to prevent possible broaching if any sort of sea was running,. The tactical diagrams of the frigate actions contained in Roosevelt's book on the naval war of 1812 point to such a phenomenon (which in turn suggests that the loss of distance to leeward was not strictly a matter of the ship's nominal tactical diameter. IIRC, I think Harland also made mention of this. At least that is what I have deduced. B |
Blutarski | 15 Sep 2021 8:34 a.m. PST |
Hi 79thPA, Touche'. I'm a subscriber to Mariner's Mirror and the French articles mentioned in the MM forum thread are actually what inspired this TMP thread. I'm interested to understand what the gamer community thinks on this topic. B |
dantheman | 15 Sep 2021 1:25 p.m. PST |
In the past I shared, in this forum, videos of the Star of India and the Charles W Morgan tacking. Both took under 5 minutes in light wind with volunteer crew, some working for the first time. The Star is a handier ship than a SOL, but the Morgan is a tub and closer to an 18th century warship. Interpret how you wish. you can check the web, the videos are still up. It is a real complicated maneuver though, requiring much coordination and sense of timing. Not easy under fire. |
Blutarski | 15 Sep 2021 3:02 p.m. PST |
Hi dantheman, Comparison of the "Star of India" and "C W Morgan" is interesting. "Star of India has a much longer and "finer" hull than that of "C W Morgan" (L/B ratio of ~5.85 versus ~3.9) and it has been my understanding that (other things being equal) shorter and beamier sailing ships (low L/B ratio) were reputed to be handier. One possible distinction is that the "Star of India" was an iron-built ship (hence heavier, with greater impetus) whereas "C W Morgan" was a lighter wooden ship. B
|
dantheman | 16 Sep 2021 5:39 a.m. PST |
What is interesting is that, either way, they tacked in similar time under similar conditions. |
|