Help support TMP


"Engine Differences in WW1 Fighters?" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Biplanes Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

New Gate

sargonII, traveling in the Middle East, continues his report on the gates of Jerusalem.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


371 hits since 10 Sep 2021
©1994-2021 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Blutarski10 Sep 2021 4:28 p.m. PST

Do any current WW1 air rules take into account the improved engines installed in German and Allied fighters over the course of the war?

For example –
> DVIIF's with the much more powerful BMW and later Mercedes "high altitude motors on place of the old 160hp Mercedes normally credited.
> Fokker Triplanes fitted with captured French Le Rhone rotaries in place of the weaker and less reliable Oberursels.
> Late war Camels fitted with high-compression Bentley rotaries in place of the older Le Rhones.
> The more powerful SE5A's that replaced the original SE5's.

Just curious.

B

khanscom10 Sep 2021 4:58 p.m. PST

TSR/Guidon Games "Fight in the Skies" provided different stats for variants of quite a number of fighters. Not quite a miniatures game, although it could be easily converted.

Fitzovich Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse10 Sep 2021 5:27 p.m. PST

Just played Wings of Glory WWI today and had a DH4 vs a Fokker Triplane. While he could certainly out turn me, I was able to walk away from him based upon my straight movement cards, so I assume that is related to a better performing engine.

Blutarski10 Sep 2021 5:57 p.m. PST

Hi Fitz,
I've played relatively few games of WoG, mostly at conventions and noted the same thing. So WoG definitely takes into account the different speed characteristics of different fighter types. The Fokker, fitted with a 110hp Oberursel rotary, was good for a max speed of about ~115mph; the SE5a, by comparison, with a MUCH more powerful in-line 6, could touch 140mph.

My question actually related to whether any rules took into account engine HP improvements in a given aircraft from one year to the next. For example the earliest Fokker D7s were fitted with a 160hp Mercedes, but these engines were progressively upgraded to 175, 180, 185hp over time (for the Albatroses and Pfalzs as well) and the DVII-F flew with the BMW D.IIIa of 210-215hp which also had much superior performance at high altitudes. Same was true with most standard Allied fighter of the war (SE5s, Camels) from one year or model to the next. Khanscom seems to have answered that question.

You were smart to use your speed to get separation on the Fokker, at which point you can turn back in your own time at a safe distance and line the Fokker up for a firing pass. Engaging in a turn fight with a Triplane is a losing deal in a DH4. My experience has been that making a head-on pass in a one-on-one fight can still be dangerous, since the Fokker has twin MGs. The separation tactic seems IMO to work best in a crowded fight, when it might be possible to deliver a fast attack while the Fokker is "otherwise occupied". FWIW.

"Fly the friendly skies ….. ;^)

B

rmaker10 Sep 2021 6:29 p.m. PST

Actually Fight in the Skies WAS a miniatures games which was turned into a boardgame (and later retitled Dawn Patrol).

Wolfhag11 Sep 2021 4:36 a.m. PST

I'm pretty sure this one does:
link

Wolfhag

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.