Shugyosha,
Thanks for reading and for responding. I can appreciate your hesitation. In a hobby that is founded on visual representation (at least since the 1960s) and on spectacle and appeal (perhaps since the early 80s?), the minority of gamers who "march to a different drum" when it comes to use of models might well be looked upon as, well . . . I am not sure, but perhaps we might be viewed as atypical or non-traditionalists, or even "splitters" – although, not being from the UK, I wonder if I used that term correctly.
Yes, the main advantage of counters is flexibility. Cost is another factor. For example, recently, I failed at a counterfactual scenario wherein Hannibal faced off against Pyrrhus. Had I used miniatures, I would still be buying and painting and preparing. Perhaps I would be able to stage the wargame in mid 2022. Changing course, I am presently studying (again) Chaeronea. I am using TRIUMPH! and the "figures" or units were fabricated in a couple of days at very little cost. Without question, the lack of stunning miniatures and equally pretty terrain impacts the number of "hits" my blog receives, but I wargame more for the interest in military history and writing about my efforts than anything else.
To be certain, I greatly admire those "celebrities" of the hobby who present the best face of wargaming. Names like Simon Miller, James Roach, and Aaron Bell spring to mind. I am sure there are a legion of others . . . Rick Priestley, the Perry Twins, Ron Ringrose, etc.
Anyway, thanks again for reading and offering a comment.
Cheers,
Chris