"HMS Nelson re-envisioned: HMS Collingwood 1929" Topic

6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the WWII Naval Gallery Message Board

Areas of Interest

World War Two at Sea

Sailing Cruel Seas - A Beginner's Guide

Featured Ruleset

Naval War

Rating:

Featured Workbench Article

Back to Paper Modeling - with the Hoverfly

The Editor returns to paper modeling after a long absence.

Featured Profile Article

Axis & Allies at Gen Con

Paul Glasser reports from the A&A Miniatures tournament.

Virtualscratchbuilder	16 Jun 2021 11:46 a.m. PST
"After the 1924 amendment to the Washington Treaty that allowed each nation to build one, and in the case of Great Britain, a 3rd treaty battleship prior to 1930, The British took the opportunity to revisit the Nelson design. Already there were doubts about the all-forward concept. Willing to delay the construction of the 3rd ship to allow a redesign, HMS Collingwood was built to a more conventional layout. 1/700 BTW. Beauty shot showing three cousins. Both the Collingwood and Inflexible are Tamiya 1/700 kits with scratchbuilt hulls.
Patrick Sexton	17 Jun 2021 7:40 a.m. PST
Nice work.
Big Red	17 Jun 2021 10:44 a.m. PST
Beautiful models! Would the Collingwood design fit within the 35,000 ton treaty limitations?
Virtualscratchbuilder	17 Jun 2021 4:29 p.m. PST
That was the intent, maybe +1000 tons to allow for a longer Citadel. Otherwise, Just a more logical Nelson.
Virtualscratchbuilder	17 Jun 2021 4:29 p.m. PST
Thanks for the comments!
JoLeCaliPout	12 May 2025 3:34 p.m. PST
I like it. The French actually planned similar redesigns for Jean Bart's successors.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.