"The Battle of Montlhéry – 1465" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Renaissance Scenarios Message Board
Areas of InterestRenaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench ArticleDon't let the horses daunt you!
Featured Profile Article
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
timurilank | 06 Apr 2021 12:57 a.m. PST |
The background leading up to this battle has been posted. There is also a map (rough) of the situation on the morning of battle. link Cheers, Robert |
Puster | 06 Apr 2021 1:57 a.m. PST |
That certainly was a strange battle, with guns playing the central role on both sides. Just read about that two days ago (strange coincidence – again). Looking forward to your setup :-) |
timurilank | 06 Apr 2021 9:02 a.m. PST |
Montlhéry was a chaotic battle with both commanders becoming unhorsed and rescued by their guard. The three French sources used sketch a better picture than any I could find in English, but the hard task is yet to come, translating the events into an enjoyable game for both sides. |
LorenzoMele | 07 Apr 2021 4:50 a.m. PST |
Well, now eager to read the scenario and the game :-) |
Puster | 07 Apr 2021 8:14 a.m. PST |
I read the passage in "The Artillery of the Dukes of Burgundy" and here it seems that Charles positioned his artillery better to to lure the French knights into a charge. It worked, the knights charged, but ran over his forces and conquered some of his guns, which Charles then won back by charging himself. A good deal of the losses on both sides (Smith mentions some 1200) was caused by guns, the rest being a more or less organized knightly exchange. Well, I should not be surprised that a book on artillery focused more on the usage and effect of artillery in that battle :-) Strangely, the Wikipage offers not much on its usage. |
|