Help support TMP


"The Battle of Montlhéry – 1465" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Renaissance Scenarios Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Impetus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Acolyte Vampires - Based

The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.


Featured Workbench Article

Adam Paints Three More Pirates

It's back to pirates for Adam8472 Fezian!


Featured Book Review


1,318 hits since 6 Apr 2021
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

timurilank06 Apr 2021 1:57 a.m. PST

The background leading up to this battle has been posted.
There is also a map (rough) of the situation on the morning of battle.
link

Cheers,
Robert

Puster Sponsoring Member of TMP06 Apr 2021 2:57 a.m. PST

That certainly was a strange battle, with guns playing the central role on both sides. Just read about that two days ago (strange coincidence – again).

Looking forward to your setup :-)

timurilank06 Apr 2021 10:02 a.m. PST

Montlhéry was a chaotic battle with both commanders becoming unhorsed and rescued by their guard.
The three French sources used sketch a better picture than any I could find in English, but the hard task is yet to come, translating the events into an enjoyable game for both sides.

LorenzoMele07 Apr 2021 5:50 a.m. PST

Well, now eager to read the scenario and the game :-)

Puster Sponsoring Member of TMP07 Apr 2021 9:14 a.m. PST

I read the passage in "The Artillery of the Dukes of Burgundy" and here it seems that Charles positioned his artillery better to to lure the French knights into a charge. It worked, the knights charged, but ran over his forces and conquered some of his guns, which Charles then won back by charging himself. A good deal of the losses on both sides (Smith mentions some 1200) was caused by guns, the rest being a more or less organized knightly exchange.
Well, I should not be surprised that a book on artillery focused more on the usage and effect of artillery in that battle :-)
Strangely, the Wikipage offers not much on its usage.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.