Help support TMP


"Paper Ships: Cruiser Minotaur" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board

Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two at Sea
Modern

Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Grand Fleets


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article

Basing Small-Scale Aircraft for Wargames

Mal Wright Fezian experiments to find a better way to mount aircraft for wargaming.


Featured Profile Article

Council of Five Nations 2010

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian is back from Council of Five Nations.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,275 hits since 20 Feb 2021
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP20 Feb 2021 8:51 p.m. PST

"While considering the various existing Neptune-class cruiser designs at the end of the WWII, the Directorate of Naval Construction of the British Admiralty came to the conclusion that the firepower of 114 mm guns used as the ship's dual-purpose artillery was obviously not enough, and that new cruisers should be designed to carry 152 mm dual-purpose guns.

Six-barreled Bofors mounts were considered for the AA artillery, but the Naval Ordnance Department insisted on increasing the small caliber artillery to 76 mm. The reason behind this was a gradual increase in both the weight of potential enemy aircraft, as well as their speed. Another reason was the assumption that their potential enemy could have anti-ship missiles within their arsenal. Larger dimensions of artillery mounts led to an excessive increase of the standard water displacement of the designed cruiser, reaching 15,500 tons with a ship length of 174 meters…"

picture

picture

picture


More here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP22 Feb 2021 9:23 a.m. PST

Like many of the end of war designs she would have been a beautiful and efficient vessel similar to the USS Rochester.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP22 Feb 2021 12:21 p.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.