Help support TMP


"Bomber Command, and Coming to Terms with Uncomfortable" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Aviation Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two in the Air

Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Buys: 1/300 Scale Hot Wheels Blimp

You can pick up a toy blimp in the local toy department for less than a dollar.


Featured Profile Article

War at Sea: Task Force Preview

Paul Glasser previews the upcoming expansion set for War at Sea.


1,223 hits since 20 Jan 2021
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0120 Jan 2021 9:32 p.m. PST

…History

"Across the street from LSE's Clement House, in front of the Royal Air Force (RAF) Chapel, a bronze figure gazes westward along The Strand. The statue depicts Sir Arthur "Bomber" Harris, Air Marshal and head of RAF Bomber Command from 1942 to 1945. Despite playing a critical role in the Allied victory in the Second World War, at a terrible cost of airmen's lives, today there are few material commemorations of this force. Only in 2011, more than 65 years after the war, was a Bomber Command memorial unveiled in Green Park, the last of the armed forces branches to be accorded a memorial in London, and only then with great controversy. The question begs: Why is it so difficult for modern society to commemorate and confront this branch of service?

Any reluctance to publicly honour the sacrifices of the airmen of Bomber Command is due to the nature of the role they were ordered to carry out. Under Harris' leadership, operations were shaped around strategic bombardment that damaged not only key Nazi industrial sites, but also adjacent areas of civilian inhabitation: the German populace. By 1942, after civilians all over Britain had suffered through the intense, deadly bombing attacks known as the Blitz, many felt that the sole way of breaking Nazi domination over Europe was a wide-ranging bombing campaign. A 1942 recording of "Bomber Harris" perfectly captures such thinking:…"
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Nine pound round23 Jan 2021 6:55 a.m. PST

Tough question. Curtis LeMay once said something to the effect of, "if the allies had lost, I would've been tried as a war criminal," which is a reminder that the challenge of dealing with the morality of this is not purely early twenty-first century second guessing.

The best defense of it I have read came from Michael Waltzer, who argued that, in effect, the Nazi regime was so awful that the Allies were justified in using the weapons they had at hand to defeat it.

Royston Papworth23 Jan 2021 11:05 a.m. PST

If the Allies hadn't carried out Strategic Bombing, would the troops and guns freed up made a difference? I suspect enough of one to stretch out the war by a couple of years and perhaps a couple of million casualties…

Huscarle24 Jan 2021 5:31 a.m. PST

+1 Royston

To quote Harris, "The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. At Rotterdam, London, Warsaw, and half a hundred other places, they put their rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind."

Warspite124 Jan 2021 2:12 p.m. PST

I should point out that there is another Bomber Command memorial in Lincoln:

internationalbcc.co.uk

I drive past whenever I drive into the city.

And, if you are a UK resident, there is a great air spotters' tea bar on the A15 opposite RAF Waddington. It's only a portable building but the tea and bacon rolls are good and there is a big screen showing all local air movements in real time.

Opposite is one of the 'Black Buck' Falklands Vulcan bombers.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.