Help support TMP


"The USSR Once Had Big Aircraft Carrier Dreams" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2010) Message Board

Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Showcase Article

Stuff It! (In a Box)

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian worries about not losing his rules stuff.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


287 hits since 12 Jan 2021
©1994-2021 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP12 Jan 2021 7:57 p.m. PST

"In the late 1960s, the Soviet shipbuilding industry began to develop its first nuclear-powered aircraft cruiser. Project 1160 Orel ("Eagle") was a nuclear-powered supercarrier with a displacement of around 80,000 tons. Orel would have featured steam catapults, carrying as many as seventy aircraft.

In line with the Soviet concept of a "heavy aviation cruiser," the proposed supercarrier would have differed from its western counterparts with a robust onboard arsenal of sixteen P-700 Granit anti-ship cruise missiles. By the early 1970s, the project was abandoned due to cost concerns and succeeded by the smaller and much less ambitious Kiev class of conventionally powered carriers…"

picture

Main page
link


And there is a Russian Navy plan to build a 100,000 ton super carrier ….

"Navy Mystery: Why Doesn't Russia Go Aircraft Carrier Crazy?"

link

Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian13 Jan 2021 3:49 a.m. PST

From The National Interest website

Old Wolfman13 Jan 2021 10:23 a.m. PST

Ulyanovsk class.

Thresher01 Supporting Member of TMP13 Jan 2021 8:29 p.m. PST

They still do, though I can't see how they'll ever be able to afford to build even one.

Barin114 Jan 2021 1:09 a.m. PST

If there is a political will, it can be built. However i doubt it there're plans to build helo carriers, with larger displacement than Mistral, and of course it will always be a concept fight between supporters of carriers and nuclear subs. As subs are cheaper to build and maintain, they'll be getting priority financing.
Happened first time in Khrushev's era….

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP14 Jan 2021 11:29 a.m. PST

Thanks Barin!.

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.