"Playtest results – Formigny 1450" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Playtest Message Board Back to the Renaissance Scenarios Message Board
Action Log
08 Jan 2021 11:31 a.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill
- Changed title from "Play test results – Formigny 1450" to "Playtest results – Formigny 1450"Crossposted to Playtest board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Renaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Profile Article
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| timurilank | 08 Jan 2021 9:15 a.m. PST |
Play test result are now at the blog. The three games resulted in narrow victories, but could easily have swung the other way. All three games last six turns and neither side had problems with pip scores.
link
Cheers,
Robert |
| mghFond | 08 Jan 2021 12:31 p.m. PST |
Well the historical victors won twice but there was one upset so I think that shows the game is winnable for either side. So good scenario game then! |
| timurilank | 08 Jan 2021 1:11 p.m. PST |
That is the challenging part of designing scenarios – minimal deviation from the historical course of events, yet alternative outcomes are possible. Historically, the arrival of the Breton contingent, atop the hill, behind the English line did create a panic forcing Gough to move most of his command across the river to defend the English rear. Having the Bretons appear at the board edge to march three or four turns to reach the English would not create the same level of urgency, but letting them appear 6BW (standard deployment distance) from the nearest English element would. |
|
reports from OrcCon 2008.
