Help support TMP


"The myth of the Viking woman warrior" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Saga


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Oddzial Osmy's 15mm Teutonic Crossbowmen 1410

The next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!


Featured Book Review


1,289 hits since 29 Dec 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0129 Dec 2020 10:40 p.m. PST

"In 2017, a team of Swedish archaeologists announced an exciting discovery: They had, for the first time, identified the remains of a Viking woman warrior. A DNA analysis of a Viking Age skeleton previously thought to be male had turned out to be female. The skeleton in question was originally discovered in 1878 in a grave known as Bj. 581 at the Swedish Viking Age trading town of Birka. Lacking the scientific knowledge available today to determine the biological sex of human remains, the 19th-century archaeologists looked at the objects buried with the skeleton — weapons like swords and spears, shields, and even the remains of several horses — and declared the human remains to have belonged to a male warrior. The modern DNA result proved this theory wrong.

The tale of the Viking woman warrior from Birka continues to capture our imaginations. She has even been called a "real-life Viking version" of Game of Thrones' iconic female knight, Brienne of Tarth. But what hasn't attracted as much attention is the ongoing controversy among scholars about the validity of these recent conclusions. According to the critics, the claim that the woman in Bj. 581 had been a warrior is based on some wobbly assumptions. That we so desperately want to believe in the Viking woman warrior, despite evidence to the contrary, says a lot about the ongoing women's movement, and betrays our rigid ideals of how we want female strength to be displayed…."
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian30 Dec 2020 5:26 a.m. PST

Courtesy of The Week website.

Greylegion30 Dec 2020 7:50 p.m. PST

Funny they referenced "real-life Viking version" of Game of Thrones' iconic female knight, Brienne of Tarth.

Instead of Lagertha from the series Vikings.

Zephyr130 Dec 2020 9:53 p.m. PST

There was also a PBS episode on this…

Puster Sponsoring Member of TMP31 Dec 2020 3:59 a.m. PST

From the article:

When we think of the Valkyries, we tend to conjure images of buxom women with braids and horned helmets.

The logician in me says that working from a false assumption you can conclude anything – the total statement will always be true, as the precondition will never be met.

In normal words: I do not think I share her view on "we" and what we should think of history or myth.

Tango0131 Dec 2020 12:40 p.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

nvdoyle31 Dec 2020 4:10 p.m. PST

Finally, some glimmer of sanity.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.