Help support TMP


"The Largest Submarine In The World Could Get Eclipsed" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board

Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

One-Hour Skirmish Wargames


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Deep Dream: Paint My Mini?

Could artificial intelligence take a photo of an unpainted figure and produce a 'painted' result?


Current Poll


1,663 hits since 2 Dec 2020
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP02 Dec 2020 9:11 p.m. PST

"Today the largest submarine in the world is Russia's mighty Typhoon Class ballistic missile sub. It's massive, but it could be dwarfed if Russian engineers get their way. A ginormous undersea tanker called the Pilgrim has been proposed to transport liquid natural gas (LNG) in the Arctic. Submarine tankers would literally slip under the ice.

St. Petersburg-based Malachite Design Bureau has unveiled a design for a massive submarine capable of carrying 170,000 to 180,000 tons at a time. That is far in excess of the volume of any previous submarine. At 1,180 feet long and 230 feet across the submarine tanker would dwarf the Typhoon. The latter is around half the length at 574 feet and one third the width at 75 feet. So in terms of volume it will be more than six times the size of the Typhoon…"

link


Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Bunkermeister Supporting Member of TMP02 Dec 2020 9:23 p.m. PST

YouTube link

As predicted in 1959.

Mike Bunkermeister Creek
Bunker Talk blog

walkabout03 Dec 2020 3:59 a.m. PST

What size tidal wave would that cause if it explodes under water?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP03 Dec 2020 11:24 a.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Choctaw03 Dec 2020 12:28 p.m. PST

Russian engineers building a submarine tanker. What could possibly go wrong?

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP03 Dec 2020 4:32 p.m. PST

No oxygen under water, so no explosion.

jfleisher03 Dec 2020 6:33 p.m. PST

Frank Herbert wrote a novel about this "Under Pressure".

Oberlindes Sol LIC Supporting Member of TMP03 Dec 2020 8:52 p.m. PST

"Russian engineers building a submarine tanker" to travel under Arctic ice!

Yeah, what could possibly go wrong?

Murvihill04 Dec 2020 1:18 p.m. PST

What benefit is there in having your tanker underwater?

Thresher0104 Dec 2020 5:54 p.m. PST

"What could possibly go wrong?".

Well, the Kursk seems to point the way to the answer to that question, along with a lot of others made by Russia, the USA, and others.

No need to worry about icebergs, or sheet ice when below the surface in the Arctic.

jdginaz05 Dec 2020 10:31 a.m. PST

However there usually is oxygen in the submarine

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.