"Napoléon’s Final Triumph" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article Volunteer  shares his techniques for painting, rigging and basing Age of Sail warships.
Featured Profile Article The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01  | 18 Nov 2020 10:20 p.m. PST |
"At Wagram in 1809, Bonaparte's Grand Armée outsmarted, outmaneuvered, outfought and outguessed the Austrian army. In the summer of 1808, news of the Battle of Bailén and the humiliating capture of an entire French army by a second-rate Spanish army hit Europe like a thunderbolt. The Austrians, whom Napoléon had repeatedly defeated since 1796, saw fresh hope: If that Spanish army could beat a French army, why couldn't they? Austria in 1808–09 was split between opposing political parties— a peace party and a war party. While the peace party wanted revenge for both the territory stripped from the empire since 1796—Italy, parts of Germany and Poland—and the Austrian defeat at the 1805 Battle of Austerlitz, Archduke Charles, leader of the peace party, did not think his army ready to take on Napoléon again. Emperor Francis I ultimately tipped in favor of the war party, deciding that since Napoléon's commitment of troops in Spain meant he could muster only 200,000 men in Germany, the odds were even…"
Main page
link Amicalement
Armand |
| 42flanker | 18 Nov 2020 11:21 p.m. PST |
"To have one peace party is unfortunate. To have two looks like carelessness." |
 deadhead | 19 Nov 2020 7:50 a.m. PST |
"Final" might be questioned? |
| Tango01 | 19 Nov 2020 11:57 a.m. PST |
|
| La Belle Ruffian | 21 Nov 2020 7:12 p.m. PST |
Deadhead, I suspect there's a reason they didn't use victory. I think the word triumph (in its original meaning) is appropriate in this case, because it's Napoleon's last decisive victory which he can celebrate on his return to France, having knocked Austria out of the 5th Coalition. After this, there are no strategic victories, they're operational or tactical ones. |
| deadhead | 22 Nov 2020 4:23 a.m. PST |
What an interesting point. Yes, thanks indeed! |
| Tango01 | 22 Nov 2020 3:33 p.m. PST |
Well said…. Amicalement
Armand |
|
