"Lady of Bietikow is Ötzi’s contemporary" Topic
1 Post
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Prehistoric Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article Five finalists are in the painting rounds of the Alpha 54mm Painting Contest (sponsored by Alpha Miniatures). Who will prove themselves masters of painting 54mm scale Ancients?
Featured Profile Article The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Tango01 | 09 Nov 2020 9:57 p.m. PST |
"The skeleton of a prehistoric woman discovered in Bietikow, Germany, has been discovered to be a rough contemporary of Ötzi, the glacier mummy discovered in the Ötztal Alps, at more than 5,000 years of age. The skeletal remains were discovered in May in the Uckermark district of northeastern Brandenburg. The area has been settled since the Neolithic and is home to numerous Bronze Age burial mounds and megaliths, so an archaeological survey was performed before construction of new wind turbines. Archaeologists found the skeleton in crouch position, one of the oldest forms of funerary positioning common in the late Neolithic. The burial was not part of a cemetery. The woman was buried in a pit within a settlement. The gravediggers enlarged the pit and bordered it with field stones. Despite the care given to the placement of her body, she had no grave goods. The finds made elsewhere on the dig dated from the Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age (5500 – 2000 B.C.), so when she was first unearthed the only preliminary dating possible was the 3500-year date range of the site as a whole…"
Main page
link Amicalement
Armand |
|
