"Oathmark Campaign system" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Fantasy Discussion Message Board Back to the Fantasy Battle Reports Message Board Back to the Fantasy Product Reviews Message Board Back to the 28mm Fantasy Message Board Back to the Campaign Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Fantasy
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article Pat Ripley  is after something that has presence, that actually looks like a small stand of tropical bushes, and is cheap, tough and portable.
Current Poll
|
| Albus Malum | 04 Nov 2020 9:53 p.m. PST |
I dont have the rules for Oathmark, but they seem interesting but cant find much on the internet from people who have actually played a campaign using the Oathmark system, so I am trying to get some input from those who may have actually played a Campaign using the system opposed to those who have just played random oneshot games. Has anyone here actually played a Oathmark campaign, and if so, how did it go, and what are your opinions of the campaign system. Has anyone expanded the rules into an even more involved system? |
Puster  | 05 Nov 2020 5:22 a.m. PST |
I decided against their campaign system, so I am not really qualified. We DID like the constraint to 10 areas and resulting unit typses quite good, and formed our armies around it, but the kingdoms are not really a "campaign". We want a real map. We plan to use the "Migthy Empire" tiles when it comes to it. |
| Albus Malum | 12 Nov 2020 4:06 p.m. PST |
So… Basicly, nobody has tried the Campaign system? Hoping someone who was a GW Mighty Empires player would chime in. |
|
