Help support TMP


"Evidence that prehistoric flying reptiles probably had..." Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Prehistoric Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Undead Dinos III

The last - the most elusive - set of dino skellies...


Featured Profile Article

The Gates of Old Jerusalem

The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


436 hits since 25 Oct 2020
©1994-2021 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP26 Oct 2020 9:23 p.m. PST

… feathers refuted.

"Pterosaur expert Dr David Unwin from the University of Leicester's Centre for Palaeobiology Research, and Professor Dave Martill, of the University of Portsmouth have examined the evidence that these creatures had feathers and believe they were in fact bald.

They have responded to a suggestion by a group of his colleagues led by Zixiao Yang that some pterosaur fossils show evidence of feather-like branching filaments, 'protofeathers', on the animal's skin.

Dr Yang, from Nanjing University, and colleagues presented their argument in a 2018 paper in the journal Nature Ecology and Evolution. Now Unwin and Martill, have offered an alternative, non-feather explanation for the fossil evidence in the same journal…"
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP27 Oct 2020 7:44 a.m. PST

Glad to hear it! I hate the idea of my gray/green dinosaurs having feathers.

rvandusen Supporting Member of TMP27 Oct 2020 9:52 a.m. PST

I remember first hearing about "hairs", fuzz, or filaments growing on pterosaurs way back in 1980, or so. It is interesting to consider that such evidence may be the product of decomposition, instead of a body covering.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP27 Oct 2020 11:20 a.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Old Glory Sponsoring Member of TMP27 Oct 2020 1:00 p.m. PST

Like so many other things they CLAIM -- they just simply do not really know !!

Russ Dunaway

Dave Crowell27 Oct 2020 5:24 p.m. PST

I am sure George Challenger could give a good eye witness account and settle the matter once and for all.

Personal logo Silurian Supporting Member of TMP29 Oct 2020 10:28 a.m. PST

Cool stuff Tango. Thanks.

It's worth pointing out that in a field of science like this there is very little 'claiming'. Based upon physical evidence, available for anyone to look at, opinions and hypotheses are proposed. As more evidence presents itself conclusions become more solid, but are always open to refutation like this. This sort of scientific back and forth is fascinating for those that are interested in the subject.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP29 Oct 2020 11:35 a.m. PST

A votre service mon ami! (smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.