"Silly formations?" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board Back to the English Civil War Message Board
Areas of InterestRenaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.
Featured Profile Article Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
Featured Book Review
|
| Tango01 | 14 Oct 2020 12:10 p.m. PST |
" There is currently quite an interesting discussion on the Facebook 17th century wargaming group concerning ECW wargames rules. What is fascinating about it is how few of the posters actually mention the period when they are extolling the virtues of their favourite set. Mechanisms – often Simplicity sometimes but rarely if ever the actual period. You would thin it would appear once in a while. But that is the "dark heart" of today's wargaming – it is ALL about game and rarely if ever about the period being gamed…."
From here
link
Amicalement
Armand
|
| BillyNM | 14 Oct 2020 9:51 p.m. PST |
Wow this is an old post, but units with deep pike blocks and shallow shot wings still abound – I hate ‘em. |
| Tango01 | 15 Oct 2020 11:25 a.m. PST |
|
| Lapsang | 16 Oct 2020 4:25 a.m. PST |
This reminds me a little of my old Wargames Club and many debates there concerning Ancients Wargames. There would be lengthy discussions concerning (for instance) what would happen were highly motivated heavy cavalry to charge a unit of infantry armed with heavy-throwing weapons, swords, and shields under WRG rules. The fact that the foot units were 1st Century BC Roman Legionaries and the cavalry were Norman Knights from a thousand years later never seemed to cross anyone's mind… |
|
