"The Battle of Wavre - June 18-19, 1815" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
|
Tango01 | 29 Sep 2020 2:45 p.m. PST |
"On June 17, 1815, the day after the Battle of Ligny, Napoleon issued an order to Marshal Grouchy: "Mr. Marshal, march with the corps of Generals Pajol and Exelmans, the light cavalry of the IV. Corps, the Teste Division and the III. and IV. Infantry Corps to Gembloux. Let the direction on Namur and Maastricht clear and pursue the enemy. Find the enemy's march and report their movements to me so that I can understand what they are really up to … It is important to investigate the intentions of Blucher and Wellington, and especially whether they are willing to control their armies reunite to un Brussels"…" UT
Main page link
Amicalement Armand
|
JMcCarroll | 30 Sep 2020 4:05 p.m. PST |
|
Tango01 | 01 Oct 2020 11:47 a.m. PST |
|
4th Cuirassier | 01 Oct 2020 11:51 a.m. PST |
Another day in 1815, another Prussian defeat. |
dogtail | 01 Oct 2020 12:02 p.m. PST |
The Germans were the reason for Napoleons defeat in the Waterloo campaign. |
ReallySameSeneffeAsBefore | 02 Oct 2020 6:04 a.m. PST |
I guess it was a defeat- but it was pretty hard fought and made it much harder for Grouchy to intervene meaningfully at Waterloo. I think you're being too hard on the Prussians Cuirassier- in the overall context of the campaign it was very useful for the allies. Just my view. Dogtail- it's hard to know what to say to your comment. I presume that it was just made in humour- as you must know that there was very much more involved than that. |
deadhead | 02 Oct 2020 7:45 a.m. PST |
This forum would be much quieter without the "old chestnuts"; Napoleon was only a little chap The Prussians won 1815 single handed (or conversely, with as much conviction, played no part at all) There is only one true scale (take your pick as to TOTS). Metal beats plastic any day (until you see what can be achieved). One Marshal of France was left behind (or fell out a window) and could have saved the 100 Days Campaign. Which one? Well for the first you have plenty to choose and they usually do. I thought this was a well written posting on Wavre and loved the photo illustrations from La Musee de l'Armee, but somehow never saw how the two quite married up. |
Tango01 | 10 May 2021 2:37 p.m. PST |
Nice map here…
link
Armand |
Erzherzog Johann | 10 May 2021 8:56 p.m. PST |
I agree wholeheartedly Deadhead. The Prussians would never have won in the 100 days without the presence of The Anglo/Scot/Irish/Welsh/Dutch/Belgian/ other Germans army. On the other hand, if at Waterloo, instead of the Prussians arriving: (a) nobody had arrived, or (b) a whole lot more French had arrived, what would the outcome have been? Cheers, John |
Allan F Mountford | 11 May 2021 12:19 a.m. PST |
That is a very good quality scan from Alison's Atlas. Thanks for posting. Regards Allan |
|