ciaphas | 15 Sep 2020 9:34 a.m. PST |
I have searched in vain, for artillery and crew for the above. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. thanks jon |
ciaphas | 15 Sep 2020 9:34 a.m. PST |
I have searched in vain, for artillery and crew for the above. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. thanks jon |
David O Brien | 15 Sep 2020 9:54 a.m. PST |
link They also have Polish. |
nickinsomerset | 15 Sep 2020 10:05 a.m. PST |
|
jedburgh | 15 Sep 2020 10:19 a.m. PST |
The League of Augsburg/Warfare Minitures have these forthcoming on their US site link |
JanissaryAga | 15 Sep 2020 3:00 p.m. PST |
I can endorse the Ottoman artillery crew from TAG. A great set. TAG's Polish line looks nice as well although I have not bought from it yet. |
D6 Junkie | 15 Sep 2020 6:15 p.m. PST |
Brigade miniatures for Ottomans |
Druzhina | 18 Sep 2020 2:08 a.m. PST |
|
Puster  | 20 Sep 2020 2:14 a.m. PST |
Thanks for these. How good are the chances that these depictions of Mohacs show the equipment from 1526, rather then that of 1588? |
Druzhina | 25 Sep 2020 5:49 a.m. PST |
|
Puster  | 27 Sep 2020 12:04 a.m. PST |
Thanks for these. Especially the infantry (probably Janissary) look different in headgear and tunic. From a first glance the cavalry also lacks feathers. Any differences may be by the perception and execution of the painting by the artists, but I assume that these "Mohacs" images suffer from the same effect that contemporary western illustrations have, using equipment known to the artists rather then being authentic. I just wish one of the Ottoman or Persian artists would have created a depiction like Altdorfers "Alexanders battle". When I do start to collect my Ottomans for the early Suleyman phase, I will aim for these rather then those shown in the Hünername – after checking some of its other depictions I see that the Janissaries depicted for Nikopolis look identical, which practially rules out any historical authenticity – its late 15th century equipment the Hünername shows. |
Druzhina | 03 Oct 2020 4:20 a.m. PST |
|