"Berthier - Austerlitz" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board
Action Log
09 Aug 2020 6:39 p.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Changed title from "Berthier- Austerlitz" to "Berthier - Austerlitz"Removed from Plastic Figures boardRemoved from Conversions boardRemoved from WWII Land Gallery board
- Changed starttime from
09 Aug 2020 4:33 p.m. PST to 09 Aug 2020 4:33 p.m. PST
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile ArticleThe Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.
Featured Book Review
|
SHaT1984 | 09 Aug 2020 4:33 p.m. PST |
|
Franck | 10 Aug 2020 9:57 a.m. PST |
??? That's Oudinot on that painting |
Brechtel198 | 10 Aug 2020 2:34 p.m. PST |
That is definitely Oudinot. |
SHaT1984 | 10 Aug 2020 5:10 p.m. PST |
OOps how embarrassing. :~[ So I wonder why he's hung in the Musee de Neufchatel now ? It is [an original painting] from an original slide of my own, an unlabelled scan that I've taken as Berthier ever since I made it back in th '90's. I'll have to dig up my record notes obviously. I know it's from there as adjacent slides are museum exhibits, including the very perfect armoral plate of the Prince '1806-1814'. Anyway thankyou- now how about the book?
u29 Porcelain Pr Neuchatel_adj sm by DaveW, on Flickr - - |
Brechtel198 | 11 Aug 2020 3:52 a.m. PST |
To which book are you referring? I must have missed it… |
MarbotsChasseurs | 11 Aug 2020 7:06 a.m. PST |
|
SHaT1984 | 11 Aug 2020 2:44 p.m. PST |
Yes thats the painting, different frame so a different copy (cant imagine museums actually selling exhibits). BooK: link The Battle of Austerlitz by Alexandre Berthier 1806. d
|
SHaT1984 | 15 Aug 2020 10:40 a.m. PST |
|
SHaT1984 | 19 Aug 2020 3:41 a.m. PST |
|
SHaT1984 | 21 Aug 2020 2:29 p.m. PST |
>>OK< So now I know, it's an "official" account of the battle in it's tightest form, with all the pallaver and dross that goes with fawning and notable 'revisions' previously submitted for 'approval'. Still- given that I'm prepared to accept with the knowledge of detail Goetz has provided also, that a number of elements critical to the battle are now at least recognisable. The translation is subtle and doesn't bother with all the military terms we already understand (whew!), but in places I think at risk because of the mangled syntax used. However, is it value for money? Probably not. However, should a military Napoleonphile and historian own a copy, probably yes? Regards davew |
|