Help support TMP


"Career with Swords: French Commanders in Sindhia’s Army" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board

Back to the 18th Century Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century
Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article

Land of the Free: Elemental Analysis

Taking a look at elements in Land of the Free.


Current Poll


336 hits since 3 Aug 2020
©1994-2021 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP04 Aug 2020 2:42 p.m. PST

Of possible interest?


PDF link

Amicalement
Armand

jurgenation Supporting Member of TMP04 Aug 2020 3:03 p.m. PST

Great article.

Dennis04 Aug 2020 5:42 p.m. PST

Okay……

I can't help but notice that the referenced article twice cites George Henty's "At the Point of the Bayonet" as if it were history rather than fiction. For those unfamiliar with Henty, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries he wrote a series of historical novels about young Brits witnessing and participating in great moments in British military history. So far as I know the wiki article is more or less accurate:

link

Either the referenced article's authors knew Henty's work was fiction or they didn't. If they knew it to be fiction then they had an obligation to so advise the reader, and if they didn't then that reflects rather badly on their research.

Also, it's John Clark Marshman, not "JOHN CLAKK Marshman." Of course this could simply be a matter of poor proofreading, and most of us make errors in writing and don't always catch them before publication. Still, the authors make the same error twice in their table of works cited and the eccentric full capitalization of Marshman's first and incorrect middle name suggests to me that the authors copied an erroneous citation from another secondary source rather than actually reading and citing Marshman's book themselves.

Based on the foregoing, I see no need to take a closer look at the article. All in all, I don't see it as a useful source.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP05 Aug 2020 11:16 a.m. PST

Glad you like it my friend!.


Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.