Help support TMP


"Can the Illogical Inertia of American Involvement in..." Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2009-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

1:300 Zelda APCs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds APCs to his Israeli forces.


Featured Profile Article


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


248 hits since 30 Jul 2020
©1994-2020 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP30 Jul 2020 1:24 p.m. PST

… the Middle East Be Broken?.

"The 29 February 2020 American peace deal with the Taliban, thus far, remains intact. The U.S. military has stopped going after Taliban leaders and fighters and has essentially transitioned to a counterterrorism mission against ISIS-K and similar radical elements. The American public writ-large (to include veterans) wants to leave Afghanistan, and thus supports doing whatever is necessary to withdraw. The Taliban have (mostly) done their part too; they have "refrained" from attacking U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan. However, Afghan soldiers, bases, and outposts with no ‘babysitting' international forces present have been fair play for Taliban attacks. Hence, the Taliban and the U.S. have become odd-bedfellows, each with a strong interest in seeing American troops leave. However, this begs the question: Will the Taliban, an ethno-nationalist insurgent group that has relied on terrorist tactics, actually commit to promises of not allowing al-Qaeda, ISIS-K, and other terrorist organizations to thrive once international security forces are gone by 1 May 2021? The answer, we argue, is complicated.

There is tremendous speculation concerning secret annexes and deals with the Taliban, painting the picture of what a post-Afghanistan with or without a U.S. and coalition presence might look like. Adding to this speculation is the potential reality of zero U.S. "BOG" (Boots on Ground) after 1 May 2021, and whether that ‘zero' might actually still include a small advisor footprint of security assurance personnel to conduct counterterrorism missions against ISIS-K and any other radical extremist elements. Such a reality is nearly twenty years in the making since the first American ground forces put their boots on the ground in Afghanistan and is – to many – inconceivable. The United States has been engaged in military conflict in the Middle East for as long as some members of the active forces have been alive. At no point in U.S. history has such a phenomenon occurred before. While there is much hope for a future where the U.S. no longer requires military ground forces in the Middle East, hope is not a course of action, and this optimism overlooks the pervading motivations behind America's longest war. The reality is that the continued illogical logic of American Middle East policy will almost certainly ensure continued military Middle East meddling for the foreseeable future. We do not have to look far for tangible examples to support this assertion…"
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Uparmored02 Aug 2020 3:23 a.m. PST

Ordinary Americans can thank a certain phenomenal US preisdent for phenomenally giving American warriors and their families what they want, rather than what the deep state wants.

Skarper02 Aug 2020 3:52 a.m. PST

Short answer – No. Long answer? Nope?

The US will never leave Afghanistan. They will stop trying to control the county and just retreat into fortified bases. They will let the Taliban have the rest.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.