Help support TMP


"Captives of Liberty: Prisoners of War and the Politics..." Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Phil Dunn's Sea Battle Games


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


445 hits since 2 Jul 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0102 Jul 2020 9:36 p.m. PST

… of Vengeance in the American Revolution

"Contrary to popular belief, the American Revolutionary War was not a limited and restrained struggle for political self-determination. From the onset of hostilities, British authorities viewed their American foes as traitors to be punished, and British abuse of American prisoners, both tacitly condoned and at times officially sanctioned, proliferated. Meanwhile, more than seventeen thousand British and allied soldiers fell into American hands during the Revolution. For a fledgling nation that could barely afford to keep an army in the field, the issue of how to manage prisoners of war was daunting.

Captives of Liberty examines how America's founding generation grappled with the problems posed by prisoners of war, and how this influenced the wider social and political legacies of the Revolution. When the struggle began, according to T. Cole Jones, revolutionary leadership strove to conduct the war according to the prevailing European customs of military conduct, which emphasized restricting violence to the battlefield and treating prisoners humanely. However, this vision of restrained war did not last long. As the British denied customary protections to their American captives, the revolutionary leadership wasted no time in capitalizing on the prisoners' ordeals for propagandistic purposes. Enraged, ordinary Americans began to demand vengeance, and they viewed British soldiers and their German and Native American auxiliaries as appropriate targets. This cycle of violence spiraled out of control, transforming the struggle for colonial independence into a revolutionary war…"

Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Au pas de Charge05 Jul 2020 12:22 p.m. PST

The British were so cruel in that war.

link

We should have invaded them after the AWI ended. :)

42flanker05 Jul 2020 1:43 p.m. PST

You mean… we were the baddies?

Au pas de Charge05 Jul 2020 2:37 p.m. PST

Didnt you watch the film "The Patriot" sir? And also the film "Braveheart"? They chronicle with historical precision all the British naughty behavior.

The British are always the baddies and the princesses are always sexy French girls.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.