"Bring Back the Seaplane" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile ArticleThe Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.
Current Poll
Featured Movie Review
|
Tango01 | 01 Jul 2020 9:39 p.m. PST |
"On December 8, 1941, Japan attacked the Philippines and destroyed nearly half of the U.S. Army Air Corps' bombers along with a third of its fighters on the ground. Yet, 43 of 45 Navy patrol aircraft survived the day. The reason for such a stark difference in survival is simple: In accordance with pre-war plans, the 45 aircraft of Patrol Wing 10 had dispersed to various lakes, beaches, rivers, and bays throughout the Philippines. The aircraft — PBY Catalina seaplanes — continued the fight from their ever-changing sea bases. Japan was left hunting for small groups of seaplanes over thousands of square miles of water and coastline. While the seaplanes alone were unable to change the course of the battle, and ultimately suffered grievous losses later in the campaign when pressed into action as bombers without fighter escort, their initial survival demonstrated a unique capability that should be considered today. As the National Defense Strategy demands, the Marine Corps is currently demonstrating, and the new Air Force chief of staff has discussed, the challenges posed by an increasingly capable Chinese military demand innovation and disruptive thinking in the Pentagon. Innovation requires strategists to consider all options on the table. Moreover, it requires all options to be placed on the table in the first place. One option noticeably absent from most debates on future operations in the Pacific Ocean is the seaplane…" Main page link Amicalement Armand
|
Tango01 | 02 Jul 2020 12:30 p.m. PST |
Bad idea…? (smile) Amicalement Armand |
Thresher01 | 03 Jul 2020 10:17 a.m. PST |
Certainly a bad idea, unless you can be assured of complete aerial dominance, since otherwise, they'll be sitting ducks easily shot out of the sky. Small, civilian ones could be useful for special ops though, if needed, and would be far more affordable. |
Tango01 | 03 Jul 2020 12:29 p.m. PST |
Thanks!. Amicalement Armand |
Chuckaroobob | 05 Jul 2020 6:05 p.m. PST |
Kinda off topic, but I think the Harrier was designed for a similar situation, since it can operate from highways or parking lots spread out all over the place. Wasn't the US Highway system designed to have straight sections every so often to allow aircraft to use them if the situation called for it? |
|