Help support TMP


"Don’t Bring a Knife to a Gunfight With China" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


622 hits since 2 Jun 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0102 Jun 2020 4:19 p.m. PST

"Even after two frustrating decades of counterinsurgency campaigns, some American military thinkers want more of the same. Their argument typically goes something like this: high-intensity warfare with China or Russia is impossible because of the persistence of nuclear weapons.[1] Instead, our adversaries will employ proxy forces and insurgents to challenge us indirectly, in the gray zone.[2] Rather than ruthlessly prioritizing large-scale combat operations and de-prioritizing and running the risk of forgetting counterinsurgency, they urge us to remember how to eat soup with a knife and prepare for new types of small wars.[3] John Vrolyk riffed on these common refrains in War on the Rocks earlier this year, arguing that because future U.S. competition with China is "almost certainly going to consist of fighting proxy wars and insurgencies around the globe where American and Chinese interests clash."[4] Vrolyk makes many excellent points about the U.S. armed forces, but his confident prediction of China using proxy forces is highly unlikely. The simple fact is that China has not supported any foreign insurgencies since the 1980s, during a period when American, Russian, and Iranian use of proxy insurgents has been typical. Despite his immense global ambitions, Xi Jinping is not going to dust off Mao's On Guerilla Warfare anytime soon. To compete with China, the U.S. armed forces need a carefully balanced toolkit that includes both integrated campaigning below the threshold of armed conflict, and conventional overmatch, should war come.[5] Preparing for counterinsurgency campaigns against an adversary who is unlikely to back insurgents is not the right approach…"
Main page

link

Amicalement
Armand

arealdeadone02 Jun 2020 11:19 p.m. PST

Good article,

Judging by how the Americans just gave the SC Sea to the Chinese and let them build fortified islands wherever they please, I suspect the Americans won't be bringing a knife to a gun fight, they'll be bringing a white flag.

Thresher0103 Jun 2020 6:33 a.m. PST

Or, sub-launched cruise missiles, if things get hotter.

15mm and 28mm Fanatik03 Jun 2020 8:13 a.m. PST

China isn't going to wage proxy wars like it did during the Mao Zedong years when its goal was fomenting Marxist revolutions to empower the proletariat, but a major conflict with the USA is even less likely. Why risk everything when it can take a page out of the American playbook and employ soft power to extend its global influence?

Cerdic03 Jun 2020 9:43 a.m. PST

Why would China want a war with its biggest customer…?

Tango0103 Jun 2020 12:43 p.m. PST

Glad you enjoyed it my friend!. (smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.