Help support TMP


"‘Entirely Unnecessary’" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ironclads (1862-1889) Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Rank & File


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

Report from Bayou Wars 2006

The Editor heads for Vicksburg...


Featured Book Review


886 hits since 4 May 2020
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian05 May 2020 3:26 p.m. PST

The ships were part of a 20-ship class of very shallow draft ironclads designed for the waters of Southern rivers and estuaries and the Western waterways.

link

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP05 May 2020 4:00 p.m. PST

Interesting – the Commission investigating government purchases in the Civil War estimated that 25% of US government spending was lost to corruption or inefficiency

skipper John05 May 2020 6:18 p.m. PST

Some things never change!!

altfritz06 May 2020 4:15 a.m. PST

Marlborough had problems in one of his campaigns when the Quartermaster ran off with the payroll.

Pyrate Captain14 May 2020 2:51 p.m. PST

Seems like a sensible ship to me.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.