"The Issue with Russian History" Topic

"Russia at the crossroads of western and eastern ways. Again? Russian history was rewritten to help Europe to free itself from the clutches of Empire Eurasia. Is Russian history a science at all? Well, one that taught in Russian schools was cooked up by learned German historians brought to Russia by Herr Romanov alias Peter the Great alias Peter the First. Herren Miller, Bayer und Schleizer did quite a job of distorting into oblivion all of pre-Romanovs history of XIV-XVII centuries! As a reformer to the hilt, Peter the Great has literally ruined Russia, lost at least a quarter of its population, tried to break into Europe, moved the capital of Russia from Moscow to St Petersburg, made from Russia an awkward upstart and a laughing stock of Europe. After spending 3 years in Holland and Germany Great First Peter ordered the nobility to cut beards, smoke tobacco, dance menuetto, and reformed the Orthodox church into total submission. He did not quite succeed in his brazen reforms, so he left a Will ordering the Russian Empire to conquer Europe again. Invention of glorious Antiquity and phantom Dark Ages saved Europe from Empire Eurasia The consensual world history was manufactured in Europe in XVI-XIX centuries with political agenda of powers of that period on the basis of erroneous chronology elaborated by Jesuits Joseph Justus Scaliger and Dionysius Petavius. – By the middle of XVI th century the prime political agenda of Europe that reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies, but was still inferior militarily to the Evil Empire of Eurasia, was to free Europe. – The concerted effort of European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants, humanists and scientists in XV – XVII th centuries in creation and dissemination of fictional Ancient World served this agenda. – The fictional Ancient World was created by representing events of XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before according to the ancient sources they wrote by authorities they invented. – The European aristocracy, a considerable part of which were fugitives from Byzantine and/or the inheritors of Eurasian warlords, supported the myth of Ancient World to justify its claims to countries they ruled. – The black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants developed and supported the myth of Ancient World to justify their claims of being more ancient and to separate themselves from Eurasian orthodoxy in the countries ruled by European aristocracy. – The scientists supported the myth of Ancient World as safe cover for their heretic research that produced results contrarian to the tenets of Christianity. They justified their discoveries by authorities of ancient scientists they themselves invented and used as pseudonyms. – The humanists developed and supported the myth of Ancient World as a cozy safe haven for their ideas that conflicted with Christianity and aristocracy. They disguised and justified their ideas on authorities of ancient authors of their own making and wrote under their glorious aliases. Saint Augustin being prescient said "..beware of mathematicians, especially when they speak the truth! "

Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Do not take this nonsense seriously. This is a real nonsense of a madman – or a stupid practical joke)))

I can't say whether he's mad or not, but its certainly nonsense.
Cuprum2, does this stuff attract any supporters in Russia? Of course there'll always be some who believe crazy nonsense, but does anybody serious pay it any attention?

How do you say "rant" in Russian?

Oh, pay it due respect. This is the Mount Everest of conspiracy theories, and I rate it even above the one that placed Homer's Troy in Cambridge. Just imagine all those historians digging throughout Europe burying classical remains for us to dig up today. Pyramidology is nothing to this!

clibinarium, in Russia, these authors take seriously only those who believe in a flat Earth, UFOs and human-reptile)))

Well that was interesting. Not interesting enough to pay any further attention, but interesting.

Sounds like a complete load of dangly bits, and to be avoided at all costs.

Super Glup!!… (smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Shorter paragraphs would be their friend…

The writers have another dozen books on Amazon all on similar theses. I rather liked the one on British History, especially the deranged rant by reviewer "Vonny" which reads like he's the author of the above out take.

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

"This item does not ship to United Kingdom"

That's a shame.

Did anyone bring a manure rake?

Fomenko is a well known "alternate history" crackpot.