Help support TMP


"Black Powder House Rule question" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Game Design Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Forest Bases on a Budget

Holy Roman Emperor Joseph III Fezian shows us that you don't need money to have great bases.


Current Poll


392 hits since 2 Apr 2020
©1994-2020 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Unlucky General Supporting Member of TMP02 Apr 2020 10:02 p.m. PST

Firstly I apologize if by some chance my question is covered in the Second Edition – I haven't read them.

Has anyone experimented with 'extra-large' unit stamina ratings and related attributes for very large units in Black Powder. If you have, how did it play out?

I'm looking at cavalry organization for WSS and at 1:20 representative ratios the rules provide for 'large' units with a stamina of 4 at 18 figures. I am considering units of up to 32 and in some cases single squadrons of 10 figures (French).

Thanks to anyone responding.

advocate03 Apr 2020 2:20 a.m. PST

I'd recommend splitting the 'very large' units into two normal ones. Unless they performed in very different ways. I was under the impression that most cavalry of the period was brigades into units of several squadrons so the tactical units would tend to be of similar size.

tabletopwargamer03 Apr 2020 11:45 a.m. PST

That would make super units.

We use larger stamina values for Italian wars pike blocks in pike and Shotte rules, but I'm not sure it would work for wss

Personal logo Unlucky General Supporting Member of TMP04 Apr 2020 11:33 a.m. PST

Thanks for your thoughts. I'm still interested in any experiences others may have had with the extra-large unit idea.

After having refreshed my understanding of the period my colleague and I are going to take a different tack with WSS cavalry (we think) using Black Powder.

It seems that the tactical unit for the times were the squadron. My allied squadrons work out at eight figures each – a small unit on their own but a large unit when formed into a demi-squadron. I realized that the squadrons of WSS cavalry regiments are akin to multi-battalion regiments in the Napoleonic period.

We are going to experiment with allowing forming and dividing formations with squadrons of the same regiment throughout a game. We have discussed this formation change on a command roll. We are aware that if dividing a larger formation we increased command rolls on the relevant brigadier a burden and a risk.

We also think that loss of stamina needs to be transferred or proportionally split when dividing a larger damaged formation. Furthermore, we are thinking that any damaged squadron forming with another undamaged body gifts their loss of stamina to the whole unit – the whole merged formation adopts the highest stamina loss of any of it's component squadrons.

Alternatively it adopts the highest average – so if a squadron with two points off it's stamina joins a demi-squadron with no loss, then the whole unit is reduced to the loss of one stamina. Likewise, a single squadron with the loss of 2 points joins a demi-squadron with the loss of one point should round up to average the whole unit at the loss of two.

A player would need to be mindful not to split a larger formation which is at it's stamina limit. An 8 figure squadron would be unable to form separately off a regimental formation if it were already at three or four points (depending on size) as it would be automatically shaken and require testing -a small unit only having 2 stamina points.

I don't think this is overly complex, stays true to Black Powder design and applied even more flavour to the period. Happy to hear what you think.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.