Historydude18 | 29 Mar 2020 6:42 p.m. PST |
Just interested to see what battles of these often overlooked conflicts are the favorites to game or read about. Mine are Arcole, Rivoli, Marengo, and Valmy. I've gamed the first three and plan to do the fourth some day. |
21eRegt | 29 Mar 2020 6:51 p.m. PST |
Don't forget Novi against Suvarov. |
Sho Boki  | 29 Mar 2020 9:00 p.m. PST |
Or Trebbia with 20km front. Bigger territory than Wagram. |
BillyNM | 29 Mar 2020 9:10 p.m. PST |
|
von Winterfeldt | 29 Mar 2020 9:47 p.m. PST |
|
John G | 30 Mar 2020 1:32 a.m. PST |
Not forgetting the Battle of Texel in the winter of 1794-95 |
Chad47 | 30 Mar 2020 2:13 a.m. PST |
Jemappes, Neerwinden, Wattignies and Fleurus. |
Brechtel198  | 30 Mar 2020 2:18 a.m. PST |
|
Allan F Mountford | 30 Mar 2020 2:53 a.m. PST |
Recently gamed Marengo using Age of Eagles. Overly cautious Austrian game play led to a Mexican standoff, which I've never experienced before. Must replay it when our gaming group gets back together with players swapping sides. |
ChrisBBB2  | 30 Mar 2020 4:11 a.m. PST |
Apart from some of those mentioned above, also on my list to fight some time: Castiglione (1796) Stockach (1799) – very unusual situation (could be a challenge for scenario design) Zurich 1 & 2 (1799) Verona (1799) – possibly the perfect stereotype balanced encounter battle, effectively symmetrical forces on symmetrical terrain; Magnano (1799) – nice sprawling mobile action. And a number of interesting smaller actions in Switzerland in 1799. My list is all from 1796 or 1799 because I've got interested in them from translating Clausewitz's fine histories of those campaigns. The 1796 volume is published: link The 1799 volumes are in press for publication in a few months' time (sign up here to be notified): https://kansaspress.ku.edu/newsletter Chris Bloody Big BATTLES! https://groups.io/g/bloodybigbattles bloodybigbattles.blogspot.com |
Sparta | 30 Mar 2020 4:15 a.m. PST |
|
15th Hussar | 30 Mar 2020 4:19 a.m. PST |
FLeurus, Zurich & Hohenlinden |
perfectcaptain | 30 Mar 2020 7:39 a.m. PST |
We just played Castiglione (1796) with some rules we've been working on for the past few years. The outnumbered Austrians lost but Davidovitch was able to not only give Massena's command a bloody nose, but to capture Massena himself! Elsewhere they were forced to retire by the fast moving French, with Wurmser unable to efficiently command his scattered army. Getting "dismayed" by the loss of some terrain features and having his flank turned made it even harder to command, leaving his divisional commanders to obey their own command characteristics. When they saw how the tide was turning around them they opted to keep falling back, and that was it. Orderly withdrawal, though. Love this period! Ettlingen and Genola were also fun with some interesting decisions in them, and now we're playing out the Tourcoing campaign. |
mghFond | 30 Mar 2020 9:50 a.m. PST |
What I've begun for the French Revolutionary period is fighting the Vendee Rebellion. Lots of chaotic encounters in often close terrain with plenty of raw troops and a wide range of commanders from inspiring to abysmal. |
138SquadronRAF  | 30 Mar 2020 10:17 a.m. PST |
|
Ruchel | 30 Mar 2020 11:13 a.m. PST |
Wattignies, Tourcoing, Tournay, Fleurus and Würzburg. |
Molesworth1 | 30 Mar 2020 11:21 a.m. PST |
My favourite period. Any battle without Buonaparte there is a good starter. Suvorov in Italy, the 1793-95 Flanders Campaign and the 1799 Helier Campaign all have some great battles. And of course Suvorov won all his! |
BTCTerrainman  | 30 Mar 2020 2:24 p.m. PST |
For me they include Castiglione, Wurzburg, Kaiserslautern and Hohenlinden. The conflict in Switzerland is also very intriguing during 1799. |
McLaddie  | 30 Mar 2020 2:32 p.m. PST |
Wurzburg, Kaiserslautern are both great situations |
mildbill | 30 Mar 2020 4:13 p.m. PST |
The Vendee has some interesting actions. |
42flanker  | 30 Mar 2020 11:02 p.m. PST |
2nd Geldermalsen. Was there a battle of Texel in 1794-95? |
Green Tiger | 31 Mar 2020 2:05 a.m. PST |
Vaux, Beaumont, Wattignies, Villers en Cauchie, Willems, Linselles, Fleurus…so many… |
mkck1947 | 01 Apr 2020 5:27 p.m. PST |
Neerwinden, Fleurus, Wurzburg in that order. |
DukeWacoan  | 02 Apr 2020 7:13 a.m. PST |
|
Sparta | 04 Apr 2020 11:26 a.m. PST |
We have played a 1799 campaign for some years now. It is somewhat different to constantly have the French player complaining that the Austrians lines with battalion guns are to hard to crack :-) But this was in my opinion propably the best and most succesfull army the Austrians ever had. |
MiniPigs | 09 Apr 2020 7:46 a.m. PST |
So…from this list, apparently all the battles of the French Revolutionary Wars are favorited? Any of you want to describe exactly why you like a given battle? |
138SquadronRAF  | 09 Apr 2020 11:33 a.m. PST |
So…from this list, apparently all the battles of the French Revolutionary Wars are favorited? Any of you want to describe exactly why you like a given battle? I find Souvorov a fascinating general. A match up between him and Boney would have been extremely interesting. |
Gazzola | 11 Apr 2020 2:20 a.m. PST |
MiniPigs I think it would be hard to pick out just one battle from any period. They all have their own individual attractions in terms of troops involved, tactics and the battlefield itself. Most of those mentioned are favourites of mine, and I can certainly understand why Castiglione, Arcole and Rivoli are favourites. They could almost be considered as the old versus the new, the challenger against the establishment. And the battlefields themselves are (or were when I walked them some years ago) in many parts, unchanged. They were certainly spectacular, especially Rivoli I also I found it particularly moving when following the advance of the French at Arcole and imagining how the French troops must have felt marching towards the Austrian positions in clear sight, under fire and with nowhere to hide. For some reason, I am also attracted to Caldiero, the action before Arcole. Sadly, I never got the chance to walk it. It was Napoleon's first defeat but, as we can see by what happened afterwards, it was obvious Napoleon learnt more from the loss than the Austrians did from their victory. |