"German army unit strength and effectiveness gradings" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleThe Editor almost has a heart attack...
Featured Workbench ArticleWhen evolved Newts happen upon a WWII comic...
|
Sir Sidney Ruff Diamond | 24 Mar 2020 5:42 a.m. PST |
I'm just reading the excellent Jason Marks book Island of Fire and there's a reference to a report on the 60th infantry division: "A report from 2 November, 1942 states it had 6 grenadier battalions: 2 medium-strength, 1 average, 2 weak and 1 battle-weary, plus 9 artillery batteries: 6 light, 3 heavy. It was ‘Bedingt zum Angriff geeignet' – conditionally suited for attack" Excerpt From Island of Fire: The Battle for the Barrikady Gun Factory in Stalingrad Jason Mark Does anyone know how these gradings were assessed? What constitutes "weak" "battle weary" etc. Obviously I can make a guess at it but there was obviously a methodology to it which I'd like to understand. I've tried googling but can't find anything.
|
Martin Rapier | 24 Mar 2020 6:43 a.m. PST |
I thought the combat ratings were 1-4 (strong, average, weak, exhausted – or their german equivalents). I don't know what the actual criteria used were. Finger in the air by the regimental commanders? |
jdginaz | 24 Mar 2020 3:09 p.m. PST |
I seem to remember it was something like, Capable of offensive action Capable of limited offensive action Only capable for defense exhausted |
Martin Rapier | 25 Mar 2020 9:30 a.m. PST |
Agree with jdginaz, but can't for the life of me remember where I read it. Zetterling maybe? Dupuy? In the 1956 British Army Tactical Wargame it is based on losses: 0-20% losses no effect on efficiency 20-40% losses half combat effect 40-75% losses retire from battle, 7 days to reorganise. Wiped out if overrun 75% or over wiped out, cannot be reorganised these are for battalion sized elements (so 600-1000 men). |
Simo Hayha | 25 Mar 2020 9:49 p.m. PST |
jdginaz is correct but cant source it. This is a really interesting book on combat effeciency ratings if your interested in more detail. link |
Keith Talent | 26 Mar 2020 1:48 a.m. PST |
There is an explanation in Zetterling, for which incidentally, there is a new "revised" edition out. Apparently it's hardly revised at all, so don't rush out and get a new one if you already have it. However, if you don't have an original, then it's a great opportunity to get one of the "must have" books for Normandy- reasonable price and on kindle |
Starfury Rider | 26 Mar 2020 7:28 a.m. PST |
There's a little detail on another forum; link And another one here; link Gary |
Sir Sidney Ruff Diamond | 26 Mar 2020 3:31 p.m. PST |
Thanks for all of the replies. I'll probably get the Zetterling book don't know how I've missed that. |
Russ Lockwood | 05 Apr 2020 8:07 p.m. PST |
It's been reissued. Normandy 1944: German Military Organization, Combat Power and Organizational Effectiveness. By Niklas Zetterling. Hardcover. 402 pages. Review on HMGS.org: Normandy 1944 Book Review (second book down) |
|