Help support TMP


"German army unit strength and effectiveness gradings" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Command Decision: Test of Battle


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Command Decision: Test of Battle

The Editor almost has a heart attack...


Featured Workbench Article

Da Pinkos from HLBS

When evolved Newts happen upon a WWII comic...


684 hits since 24 Mar 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Sir Sidney Ruff Diamond24 Mar 2020 5:42 a.m. PST

I'm just reading the excellent Jason Marks book Island of Fire and there's a reference to a report on the 60th infantry division:

"A report from 2 November, 1942 states it had 6 grenadier battalions: 2 medium-strength, 1 average, 2 weak and 1 battle-weary, plus 9 artillery batteries: 6 light, 3 heavy. It was ‘Bedingt zum Angriff geeignet' – conditionally suited for attack"

Excerpt From
Island of Fire: The Battle for the Barrikady Gun Factory in Stalingrad
Jason Mark


Does anyone know how these gradings were assessed? What constitutes "weak" "battle weary" etc. Obviously I can make a guess at it but there was obviously a methodology to it which I'd like to understand. I've tried googling but can't find anything.

Martin Rapier24 Mar 2020 6:43 a.m. PST

I thought the combat ratings were 1-4 (strong, average, weak, exhausted – or their german equivalents).

I don't know what the actual criteria used were. Finger in the air by the regimental commanders?

jdginaz24 Mar 2020 3:09 p.m. PST

I seem to remember it was something like,

Capable of offensive action
Capable of limited offensive action
Only capable for defense
exhausted

Martin Rapier25 Mar 2020 9:30 a.m. PST

Agree with jdginaz, but can't for the life of me remember where I read it. Zetterling maybe? Dupuy?

In the 1956 British Army Tactical Wargame it is based on losses:

0-20% losses no effect on efficiency
20-40% losses half combat effect
40-75% losses retire from battle, 7 days to reorganise. Wiped out if overrun
75% or over wiped out, cannot be reorganised

these are for battalion sized elements (so 600-1000 men).

Simo Hayha25 Mar 2020 9:49 p.m. PST

jdginaz is correct but cant source it.

This is a really interesting book on combat effeciency ratings if your interested in more detail.

link

Keith Talent26 Mar 2020 1:48 a.m. PST

There is an explanation in Zetterling, for which incidentally, there is a new "revised" edition out. Apparently it's hardly revised at all, so don't rush out and get a new one if you already have it. However, if you don't have an original, then it's a great opportunity to get one of the "must have" books for Normandy- reasonable price and on kindle

Starfury Rider26 Mar 2020 7:28 a.m. PST

There's a little detail on another forum;

link

And another one here;

link

Gary

Sir Sidney Ruff Diamond26 Mar 2020 3:31 p.m. PST

Thanks for all of the replies.

I'll probably get the Zetterling book don't know how I've missed that.

Russ Lockwood05 Apr 2020 8:07 p.m. PST

It's been reissued. Normandy 1944: German Military Organization, Combat Power and Organizational Effectiveness. By Niklas Zetterling. Hardcover. 402 pages.

Review on HMGS.org:

Normandy 1944 Book Review

(second book down)

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.