"U.S. Grant and Operations" Topic

"The Civil War has been alternatively described as the last of the Napoleonic Wars or the first of the modern wars.1 Clearly it was a transitional war and one man, more than any other, can be credited with making the transition. That man was U.S. Grant, the Union General-in-Chief. He was innovative on both a strategic and operational level. Changes he introduced altered future warfare and accelerated the defeat the South. While Grant's strategic vision was vitally important to victory, this paper concentrates on his operational, as opposed to tactical or strategic, innovation. Much as been written about the North's successful strategy.2Many other books describe the tactical changes that occurred during the war,3 but few authors highlight the operational change introduced by Grant.

There are three levels of decision-making and actions within war. These are strategy, operations and tactics. "Tactics" is defined in one dictionary as "the science and art of using a fighting force to the best advantage having regard to the immediate situation of combat."4Alternatively, the Marine Corps equates the tactical level with winning battles and combat engagements, using firepower and maneuver, in a particular time and place. The Marines identify tactics as the lowest level of war, beneath the strategic and the operational levels. Activities at the strategic level reflect national policy objectives, and military strategy reflects the application of military power to meet national policy objectives. Operations link the strategic level with the tactical level; operations are the use of tactics to achieve strategic objectives. The operational level includes decisions regarding when, where and under what conditions to engage the enemy in battle – or when to refuse to engage the enemy…#
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

I find it amazing that at the start of the Civil War Grant wasn't even in the Army. He had left the Army years prior as a junior officer and volunteered when the war started. He rapidly rose in rank because he was competent and knew how to win. He was a remarkable war fighting General.

I enjoyed the part of the article about the tactical, operational, and strategic level of war. I always felt that the Air Force was excellent at teaching the tactical level of war but not the operational level.

Glad you enjoyed it my friend!. (smile)

Amicalement
Armand

A number of annoying little errors make it sadly flawed. For instance, it was C. F. Smith at Donelson, not W. F. Smith.