"What if Lincoln didn't run for the Presidency in 1860?" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAmerican Civil War
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench ArticleNeed custom bases?
Featured Profile ArticleA Civil War boardgame is adapted to miniature wargaming.
|
Tango01 | 15 Feb 2020 10:43 p.m. PST |
"What if Abraham Lincoln decided not to run for the Presidency in 1860? I think a ticket of Senator William Seward and Governor Salmon P Chase would have been nominated by the Republican Party in Chicago. I believe the Civil War wouldn't have happened and the issue of Slavery would have been kicked like a can down the road to be dealt with at another time…." Main page link Amicalement Armand |
donlowry | 16 Feb 2020 10:16 a.m. PST |
? The election of any Republican -- not just Lincoln -- would had led to secession, war, etc. |
Tango01 | 16 Feb 2020 3:11 p.m. PST |
|
Bill N | 16 Feb 2020 3:25 p.m. PST |
Lincoln was generally billed as the more moderate Republican compared to either Seward or Chase. Any of those three would mean secession. A Bates election might have avoided it. Not sure about Cameron. Once southern states started seceeding Seward might have been able to avoid war. The cost would have been a separate nation of deep south states. I am betting Chase would have initiated the war. Lincoln's strategy caused the Confederacy to initiate it which probably was the best course. |
Tango01 | 17 Feb 2020 11:07 a.m. PST |
Thanks!. Amicalement Armand |
|