Help support TMP


"M60A1 and M60A2 Retirement Dates?" Topic


25 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Workbench Article

CombatPainter Makes a Barbed Wire Section

combatpainter Fezian has been watching some documentaries lately set in the Western Desert, and was inspired to create this...


Featured Profile Article

Military Playsets at Dollar Tree

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian locates some hard-to-find military toys at the dollar store.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,159 hits since 12 Feb 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Thresher0112 Feb 2020 9:52 p.m. PST

Anyone know when the M60A1 and M60A2 were retired from the US Army and Marines?

I see mention the M60A1s served in Desert Storm in 1991 with the US Marines, and that apparently all Pattons were retired in 1997.

I'd like to know when they were retired, and/or pulled from NW Europe.

Rudysnelson12 Feb 2020 11:50 p.m. PST

The First Cavalry Division BEGAN getting the M1 in early 1979. The first battalion to get some was the Cavalry 1/9 squadron. They replaced the M551 Sheridan. They conducted field tests while other battalions received them. The M60A2 battalion got the next batch.

Wolfhag13 Feb 2020 3:50 a.m. PST

I'm pretty sure the Marines started transitioning just before the First Gulf War.

Thresher01, you going to DundraCon this weekend?

Wolfhag

Onomarchos13 Feb 2020 5:52 a.m. PST

The M60A1s were replaced in USAREUR starting in 1979 and were gone by 1981. The M60A2s were replaced between 1980 and 1981. Note that these tanks were not necessarily replaced with M1s, but with M60A3s.

Mark

Major Mike13 Feb 2020 7:39 a.m. PST

The a1's were around in the Army almost into the 1990's as well as the M48a5. They were standard in the National Guard and Reserves with only the round out units for Active Duty Divisions getting the M-1 before some Active Duty Battalions. The 1st Infantry Division didn't start getting M-1's until late 1988. The units of the division had a wide selection of different a1's, some with searchlights and IR sights and others with no searchlight and passive sights. Replacement of the a1's in units in Europe with the a3 were not complete until first half of 1982 (we got ours just before Christmas 1981 and we were a front line unit). I think the 8th ID was the last to transition to the a3.

Thresher0113 Feb 2020 8:18 a.m. PST

Thanks for all the replies, and info. I really appreciate it.

Alas no, Wolfhag, though I'd like to. I have to work, instead, and getting weekends off is difficult, to impossible now, sadly.

I wish I could, since I would like to try out your rules, and still want a copy of them.

Let me know next time you are up in Sac, and we'll see if I can work things around to get a bit of time off.

I'm trying to convince Timecast to produce the M60A1 and A2 tanks as well, to go with their A3 model.

I much prefer the M60A1, since it served from 1962 – 1982, so for much of the Cold War, as opposed to just the end of it. I'm hoping to get them to produce the one with the mounted searchlight, since it just looks so cool. That way, I can game almost any period I want for Soviet/WP attacks into NW Europe.

I figured the M60A1s would be brought back into any late Cold War scenarios if it had really gone hot, to make up for losses, and since it was such an effective vehicle.

I read on-line that the last A1s with new FC software were able to hit targets while on the move (the M60A1 moving) at 2,000m, 70% of the time, making it enormously more effective. Results were from testing at Aberdeen. Prior to that, its chance was virtually zero, so it would have been similar to the M-1 tank, I suspect, in terms of being able to effectively fire on the move.

If you are interested in them as well, write them, and perhaps they'll consider producing them too, since the hull is already done, and much of the rest of the tank too, with their M60A3 variant.

Would like the M60A2s too, to give the NATO/US players fits with that one, and its missile/gun combo.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse13 Feb 2020 8:34 a.m. PST

Yes, everything my fellow Vets has posted I agree. thumbs up

BTW – Now here is a real anomaly. I was assigned to the 197th Mech Hvy Bde(SEP) at Ft. Benning, GA, '86-'90. Consisting of 2 Mech[M113] Bns and 1 Tank Bn, + Support, e.g. FA Bn, etc.

The 197th was part of the 18th Airborne Corps. Which had both the 82d and 101.

The Tank Bn of the 197th was unique AFAIK in the US ARMY. In that the Tank Bn had 3 M60A1 Cos. and 1 M1IP Co. Having commanded one of the Mech Cos in one of the Mech Bns. I was frequently cross-attached to that Tank Bn.

M48a5.
The 2 Tank Bns in the 2ID in the ROK had M48a5s in the early 80s, IIRC.

M60A2s
From what I heard from the "old timer" back then. Most of the M60A2s with combo missile/cannon system generally were down for maintenance. I guess the Combo weapons system had some problems. IIRC it was the same or similar to M551 Sheridan's main gun.

So for gaming purposes you may want to add a maint. 1d6 roll to for each M60A2. To see if it gets out of the motor pool !
evil grin E.g. 1d6 : 1-3 it's dead lined, 4+ it can roll !

ReallySameSeneffeAsBefore14 Feb 2020 6:44 p.m. PST

Ononmarchos- "The M60A1s were replaced in USAREUR starting in 1979 and were gone by 1981." I think that it depends what you mean by the term "gone".

The European POMCUS depots of the 1st ID and 5th ID certainly retained M60A1s for quite a bit longer. The 5th ID drew them for use in Reforger 84 CERTAIN FURY, and the 1st ID drew theirs in 1986 for CERTAIN SENTINEL. I'm looking at photos of both as I write this.

Thresher0114 Feb 2020 8:39 p.m. PST

Yea, I'll bet if the Cold War actually went hot, ALL those mothballed vehicles, including even the M60A2s would have seen service in Western Europe, to make up for the very high attrition rates expected for WWIII.

Training, and/or finding crews to man them all would have been more difficult than obtaining the equipment.

Soviets/WP also had deep reserves of a lot of surplus vehicles, including even old WWII models.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse15 Feb 2020 9:28 a.m. PST

The Crews would supposed to be coming from CONUS to man those POMCUS Vehicles. By air hopefully …

Some of those POMCUS stocks may have included even M48A5s.

POMCUS locations were targeted by the USSR with airstrikes, missiles, SF units or sleeper cells.

Depending on "how Hot" WWIII in Europe got, with losses of personnel, equipment and also importantly ammo and fuel usage rates along with repair parts, etc. WWIII in the ETO may not have lasted more than a few months ? You can be sure that Supply Pts, Supply Lines, Airfields, Ports, etc., would all be prime targets.

Of course if someone started tossing WMDs around … it may have been over very quickly.

Dynaman878915 Feb 2020 12:19 p.m. PST

> POMCUS locations were targeted by the USSR with airstrikes, missiles, SF units or sleeper cells.

The same is certainly true for all those WP storage sites. Might have been a more "come as you are" war then generally accepted back in the day.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse15 Feb 2020 4:27 p.m. PST

Of course, very much so. Both NATO and WP would probably take some very losses in the first few weeks if not days. Running out of replacements, ammo, fuel, parts, etc.

You'd have to got to war with what you have on hand and after the first few major engagements. You'd be using what would have been left.

Rudysnelson16 Feb 2020 7:29 a.m. PST

I was an S4 of the MI battalion, in the 1ID during 1981. One week or 10 days we went on a classified mission to tour our POMCUS sites. We visited all locations to count equipment and ammo.

Concerns included discussions on security of the sites and equipment availability. The projected 15-20% loss of troops during the flight over was annoying. The information that some AFVs would be looted by blue forces to use as replacements was also eye opening. The sites were not only targeted by the Soviets but the French and Americans to keep them from falling into Soviet hands.

One more observation, then a funny story. A majority of the security forces were East German and Czech refugees. So how many agents were among them? So our ammo was stored in a huge mountain where the entrance was through fields on a back road. We expressed concern over getting the ammo out. They said most would be delivered to pre-positioned supply points which were the thing back then.
Anyway as we drove to the site we passed a wagon with three young men in it. Well after over an two hours, we made our return trip. Well the wagn was still on the road and as we passed them, I turned to look at an example of a German wagon. Well two of the three men had cameras out and taking our photos! Agents were every where.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse16 Feb 2020 7:41 a.m. PST

thumbs up

Well two of the three men had cameras out and taking our photos! Agents were every where.
I had heard similar …

E.g. In Panama there were Russian Trawlers off the coast taking our pics.

In the ROK the Norks were taking our pics.

Even my very brief time at Fulda along the IGB they were taking our pictures.

I hope they got my good side … evil grin

ScoutJock16 Feb 2020 9:25 a.m. PST

I was in the only Cav unit in USAREUR whose mission was to go west when the balloon went up.

2AD (FWD) was stationed in northern Germany ostensibly to bolster NorthAG, but actually had the mission of protecting the POMCUS sites until III Corps could fly in the troops to draw the equipment and get into the fight.

ReallySameSeneffeAsBefore20 Feb 2020 4:04 p.m. PST

I'm pretty sure that the POMCUS stocks replicated the current equipment of the stateside unit- hence many M1s sitting quietly in air conditioned warehouses in Germany waiting for the 1st Cav and rest of 2nd AD to fly in, while units actually serving in Germany like the 8th ID were still driving their M60A3s around.

The Divisions with POMCUS sets were IIRC- 1 Cav, 2AD, 1ID, 4ID, 5ID. This would- all being well (famous last words), then create 3 Corps each of 3 Divs in war.

PS- re the M60A2s- I think that they were sent back to the factory and pretty much all rebuilt as M60A3s, bridging, or engineer tanks. I think by the mid 1980s M48A5s weren't in the warehouses any more because none of the stateside units which had European POMCUS sets still used them back home. If the war lasted long enough- all sorts of stuff might come over to Europe shipborne though as further reinforcements/casualty replacements.

ScottS20 Feb 2020 8:07 p.m. PST

I'm pretty sure the Marines started transitioning just before the First Gulf War.

Sortof. We were scheduled to, then the war happened. 1st Tanks went over to Saudi Arabia first. 2nd Tanks went over, then went back to the states, got their M1A1s, then came back to Saudi Arabia while 1st Tanks still had M-60A1s.

Yes, I was with 1st Tanks. No, I'm not bitter.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse21 Feb 2020 8:31 a.m. PST

PS- re the M60A2s- I think that they were sent back to the factory and pretty much all rebuilt as M60A3s, bridging, or engineer tanks. I think by the mid 1980s M48A5s weren't in the warehouses any more because none of the stateside units which had European POMCUS sets still used them back home. If the war lasted long enough- all sorts of stuff might come over to Europe shipborne though as further reinforcements/casualty replacements.
I believe that is all correct … Good intel …

1st Tanks still had M-60A1s.
Yes I remember seeing USMC M60A1 Tanks with ERA during GW1 …

Armitage Shanks04 Mar 2020 11:29 a.m. PST

Slightly off topic but visually an M60A1 and M60A3 were almost indistinguishable – is that true ?

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse04 Mar 2020 4:32 p.m. PST
Thresher0104 Mar 2020 10:25 p.m. PST

M60A1s usually have the searchlights mounted above the gun barrel.

Being a dinosaur from that era, I really prefer that look.

ScottS05 Mar 2020 8:26 a.m. PST

M60A1s usually have the searchlights mounted above the gun barrel.

Ours didn't. I think I mounted one once in tank school, after that they sat in Supply and gathered dust.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse05 Mar 2020 12:43 p.m. PST

I don't think our M60A1s had the searchlight above the main gun either …

Armitage Shanks05 Mar 2020 7:33 p.m. PST

Thanks all – sounds like I need not get hung up about the choice of M60 model when gaming US armor late 70s/early 80s.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse06 Mar 2020 9:26 a.m. PST

That would probably be good. The Tank Bn in the Hvy Mech Bde from Benning, I was part of, '86-'90 had M60A1s.

Interestingly the Tank Bn also had a unique TO&E. 3 M60A1s and 1 M1IP Cos. Regardless stick with M60A1s …

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.