One of the things that has always irritated me about portrayals on screen of England's King Henry V is that they always miss or forget about his prominant facial scar.
Henry was hit in the face by an arrow at the Battle of Shrewsbury and ended up with the broken arrow lodged deep in the bone of his face. This remained in the wound for several days and was in danger of killing him until an English 'doctor', for want of a better word, come up with a device which resembles one of those posh cork screws, the sort with levers on each side which are pushed down to pull the cork out. He screwed the device into the socket of the arrow and was able to engage it and then pull it out.
More here:
link
In due course young Prince Hal survived and recovered but this injury would have left him with a prominent scar on one cheek, probably the right cheek as the only portrait we have of him shows his left side of his face, facing to our left. The right side cannot be seen (see portrait in link above). Although this was still an artistic style it is noticeable that Richard II was the first king to be shown 'full face' and full face was the (then) modern style. So I have always suspected that the royal portrait concealed a large scar.
I have always been irritated that the likes of Sir Laurence Olivier and then Kenneth Branagh went for 'movie star' good looks and the same was in a recent BBC production.
So I was a little tickled today. in my local branch of magazine sellers W.H. Smith, to see the latest copy of 'All About History' with its front cover shot of Henry showing a yelling armoured actor – complete with sword and crown – and a very prominent scar on his right cheek. I did not buy the magazine (far too general for me) but I award them the Warspite 10 out of 10 for finally grasping the nettle and giving us a representative view of what King Henry V would have looked like.
Medieval modellers in the larger figure scales please note.
B