Help support TMP


"How the Korean War Almost Went Nuclear" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

20mm Army Dogs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finally begins Vietnam.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's Train Tracks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian checks out some 10/15mm railroad tracks for wargaming.


711 hits since 18 Jan 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0118 Jan 2020 8:44 p.m. PST

"On the final night of World War II, hundreds of U.S. Army Air Forces B-29s swarmed over Japan, severing the frayed threads of Japanese resistance. Coming at the end of a long war, those mid-August 1945 missions should have been a curtain call for the world's preeminent heavy bomber.

The following year, most of the thousands of Boeing Superfortresses that had served in the Pacific were stored at the vast Davis-Monthan airfield near Tucson, Arizona, to be mothballed or scrapped. The airplane that had demonstrated that one bomber could destroy a city with one bomb would, it was assumed, hand the baton to a rising generation of bombers powered by jet engines. As it turned out, the B-29's retirement didn't last. Although underpowered and inclined to engine fires, the Superfortress remained America's indispensable airplane—the only one in the world configured to deliver the enormous plutonium bombs of the day…"
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse19 Jan 2020 8:34 a.m. PST

I had heard Mac wanted to drop nukes along the China/Nork border … That may have worked !? But use of any Nukes certainly could have made a big wider war/mess.

Fortunately we didn't have to find out either way … and hopefully is will stay that way.

Today the biggest threat of Nukes is any getting into the hands of religious fanatics, fundamentalists, radical, jihadi, terrorists types, e.g. ISIS or the IRGC. I had heard that UBL was looking to buy/get some Nukes too.

The last thing the world needs in a terrorist group or rogue nation getting deployable WMDS/Nukes … As chances are they would be more apt to use them than any other group, movement or states.

Tango0119 Jan 2020 3:28 p.m. PST

North Korea?….

Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse19 Jan 2020 3:46 p.m. PST

North Korea has Nukes … Un just may not be able to deploy them the distance he would like. Or enough not to get shot down by our Anti-missile tech.

Tango0120 Jan 2020 11:33 a.m. PST

For the moment…. (smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse20 Jan 2020 3:55 p.m. PST

Only a matter of time really … maybe …

Virginia Tory21 Jan 2020 8:29 a.m. PST

MacArthur wanted to drop enough bombs to damage and contaminate the supply lines across the Yalu. A good thing he wasn't allowed to do that.

FEAF did, OTOH, do some "scare" missions over North Korea to send political messages--such as having single B-29s dropping one bomb on Pyongyang, for example.

They did get the message.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse21 Jan 2020 8:36 a.m. PST

thumbs up

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.