Help support TMP


"S. Korea refuses to send troops to Strait of Hormuz..." Topic


24 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Action Stations !


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The 4' x 6' Assault Table Top

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian begins to think about terrain for Team Yankee.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Streets & Sidewalks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!


Current Poll


1,246 hits since 9 Jan 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0109 Jan 2020 10:35 p.m. PST

… despite 70% of its crude oil imports shipping through there.

Read it here….
link

Amicalement
Armand

Rudysnelson09 Jan 2020 10:42 p.m. PST

Due to a constant threat from North Korea, they should not be expected to deploy to the Persian Gulf region.

Thresher0109 Jan 2020 10:55 p.m. PST

Perhaps they can go solar, or use wind power, instead.

If they get 70% of their oil from the region, and want that to continue, then they should contribute to helping to keep the straits free, and the oil flowing from there.

Rudysnelson10 Jan 2020 8:25 a.m. PST

With one the largest OPEC nations being Indonesia, they could shift purchasing there.

USAFpilot10 Jan 2020 8:33 a.m. PST

Indonesia is not an OPEC country.

link

In the global economy, when price of oil goes up anywhere it has an affect on the price of oil everywhere.

15mm and 28mm Fanatik10 Jan 2020 9:14 a.m. PST

"Seoul is in a dilemma as it wishes to avoid damaging its long-standing trade relations with Iran."

Not every nation is going to let Washington dictate to them whom they should trade with and how they should conduct their foreign policy.

USAFpilot10 Jan 2020 9:33 a.m. PST

Not every nation is going to let Washington dictate to them whom they should trade with and how they should conduct their foreign policy.

So which nations do let Washington dictate their trade and foreign policy? Sounds like you are implying that most do. Can you list them?

15mm and 28mm Fanatik10 Jan 2020 9:51 a.m. PST

The British for starters. They're practically "yes men" for the US and are in-line with the US on just about all matters of foreign policy and trade. The rest of Western Europe not as much to varying degrees.

pzivh43 Supporting Member of TMP10 Jan 2020 12:25 p.m. PST

Tell me why anyone should do business with Iran? State sponsor of terrorism, arguably in the world, whose stated national policy is to wipe Israel off the map and kill all Americans?

Tango0110 Jan 2020 12:49 p.m. PST

I could told you…

link

link

link


Amicalement
Armand

Stryderg10 Jan 2020 2:01 p.m. PST

Same reason people buy cheap Chinese knock-offs (or illegal recasts of minis), the price is right. So why get into all those complicated ethical and moral issues when they can save a few bucks?

Bigby Wolf10 Jan 2020 2:03 p.m. PST

@Pz4HV3 (no personal insult intended!):

Because pre-1953 Iran was amazingly good to do business with? You guys are just so butthurt over 1979 that you seem to forget all prior history.

Because Saudi Arabia, followed by Pakistan, is the No. 1 state sponsor of terrorism in the world? One could argue the USA, but I'm not going to (because I don't believe it!).

Israel? Yeah … can't really argue that one … Iran keeps saying it … it's like their biggest weakness. They really should just shut up about that and have far more friends.

"Kill all Americans" … do they really say that nowadays? You could say "Sticks and stones…"

Rudysnelson10 Jan 2020 2:05 p.m. PST

Usafpiot. I just did a simple google search for opec. Indonesia is listed as a member country. Whether they are still a member country or not, South Korea could get their oil from them. That was my point.

Bigby Wolf10 Jan 2020 2:13 p.m. PST

Yeah, they actually are. TBH, I was surprised …

USAFpilot10 Jan 2020 3:28 p.m. PST

OPEC link

It's a global economy.

Bigby Wolf10 Jan 2020 3:45 p.m. PST

That was mildly confusing. But, it stated that: "Ecuador, Indonesia and Qatar are former members."

I'm surprised Qatar is a former member. But I honestly never knew that Ecuador and Indonesia were members.

pzivh43 Supporting Member of TMP10 Jan 2020 5:32 p.m. PST

Bigby--none taken.

Hard to say that pre-1953 Iran and current regime are at all related except for geography,

Bigby Wolf10 Jan 2020 6:59 p.m. PST

Oh, obviously no "relation" at all. There's just an awful lot of Iranians (not necessarily resident in Iran!) who still harken back to those "apparently" golden days.

Personally, I think Iran has built a kind of bed over the past 40 years (no small period of time!) and it's up to them to live in it. We saw a lot of civil discontent last year, that was put down pretty damned violently. We've also seen some horrific human-rights abuses in Iran, condoned and conducted by Iranian authorities (gay hangings, for example).

I guess because I have actual Iranian friends (although they don't live in Iran! They live in Japan) I feel "something" other than total hatred for the nation. I guess I believe Iran could be a much better place than it currently is.

Dn Jackson Supporting Member of TMP10 Jan 2020 9:37 p.m. PST

Iran could be a much better place than it is, without the current leadership. They are fighting quite hard to keep their population suppressed and Europe and Asia buying oil from them helps with that oppression.

They're a major reason behind the ongoing fighting in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Palestine, and Yemen. So, yeah, I think Europe should consider the effect of sending money to them to buy oil.

COL Scott ret10 Jan 2020 9:40 p.m. PST

It's possible to like the people and still hate what their government is doing and has been doing for 40 years.

Oberlindes Sol LIC Supporting Member of TMP10 Jan 2020 10:22 p.m. PST

@Col. Scott: It's simultaneously possible to like the people and hate what the preceding government was doing for the previous 26 years. You can walk back through the history of horrific oppression for quite a bit longer, but I'll just plug Professor Rejali's book that basically does that:

link

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP11 Jan 2020 12:10 a.m. PST

I have a great deal of sympathy for the Iranians. In a place where you can vote for anyone you like….providing the ruling elite like the candidate, you can hardly blame them for their government's actions.

Hey, there's true democracies in the world where I don't blame the people for their choice of leader and his actions!

Lion in the Stars13 Jan 2020 3:59 p.m. PST

It's possible to like the people and still hate what their government is doing and has been doing for 40 years.

Yup.

On 9/11/01, when Arab countries were having spontaneous street parties that 'the Great Satan' had been struck, Iran had spontaneous candlelight prayer vigils for the victims.

I don't much like Iran's government. The people are fine.

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP13 Jan 2020 6:42 p.m. PST

On 9/11/01, when Arab countries were having spontaneous street parties that 'the Great Satan' had been struck, Iran had spontaneous candlelight prayer vigils for the victims.

I didn't know that. That says a lot about Iranians. I fervently hopes that things improve for them.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.