/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory [TMP] "Italian Heavy Cruiser Fiume Review" Topic

 Help support TMP


"Italian Heavy Cruiser Fiume Review" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board

Back to the WWII Naval Product Reviews Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two at Sea

Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Storing Projects

Containers for when you need to sideline that project you've been working on, or maybe just not lose the bits you're not ready for yet.


Featured Profile Article

War at Sea: Task Force Preview

Paul Glasser previews the upcoming expansion set for War at Sea.


3,133 hits since 3 Jan 2020
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0103 Jan 2020 8:14 p.m. PST

"The Fiume was a Zara class heavy cruiser of the Italian Regia Marina. Her name derives from the city of Fiume and her motto "Sic indeficienter virtus" (thus with inexhaustible valour) derived from the city's motto since 1659, Indeficienter.

Built-in the Stabilimento Tecnico Triestino at Trieste, she entered service at the end of 1931. At the start of the Second World War, she was assigned to 1st Cruiser Division, based at Taranto. During the war, she and her sister cruisers Zara and Pola fought together in the Battle of Cape Matapan, during which were all sunk on 29 March 1941…"

picture

picture

picture


Full Review
link


Amicalement
Armand

Tango0104 Jan 2020 10:55 a.m. PST

The Italians made nice ships….


Amicalement
Armand

14th NJ Vol04 Jan 2020 3:31 p.m. PST

Yes they did. Their lack of fuel really crippled them.

Tango0105 Jan 2020 3:08 p.m. PST

Agree!.


Amicalement
Armand

Lee49417 Apr 2020 10:24 a.m. PST

Nice but … they really sacrificed armor for speed and that never worked well. Plus their damage control left much to be desired and their repair capability was dismal. So they were really one battle wonders. Score some hits and damage and they were out of the war. Cheers!

Tango0119 Apr 2020 7:47 p.m. PST

Sadly truth…..


Amicalement
Armand

sidley01 May 2023 12:14 p.m. PST

Also their gun design on cruisers was terrible. The guns in the turret did not include independent elevation and were too close together. This was to save weight to help,speed. Therefore the shells were fired together and were so close the air displacement of the shells impacted each other causing inaccuracy.
Plus no radar so nearly helpless at night and easy to surprise.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.