Help support TMP


"What guns meant in eighteenth-century Britain" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Firearms Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance
18th Century
Napoleonic
American Civil War
19th Century
World War One
World War Two on the Land
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Painting the USS Meade

Having scratchbuilt a flying monitor, dampfpanzerwagon Fezian now paints and bases the model.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's Rural Fields and Fences

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian gets his hands on some fields and fences.


Featured Book Review


709 hits since 26 Dec 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0126 Dec 2019 9:47 p.m. PST

"This article briefly summarizes the place of guns in British society and culture in the long eighteenth century. My approach is that of a historical anthropologist, examining the meaning of guns from the way they were used and depicted. I examine the way guns were used and understood in civilian and military realms, especially their meaning and role in the expansion of the British Empire. Finally, the essay discusses whether and how this history should influence our understanding of the Second Amendment, which was written in the eighteenth century. It concludes that history substantiates both sides of the current debate about gun use in America and that we must therefore turn to other ethical systems of judgment to resolve that debate…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP27 Dec 2019 11:36 a.m. PST

Appalling conclusion.

Tango0127 Dec 2019 11:41 a.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

COL Scott ret31 Dec 2019 11:54 p.m. PST

Yes we should always listen to a very one-sided professor with a preexisting conclusion.

… the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

What other individual rights will be the next in line for this professor to decry.

AICUSV03 Jan 2020 10:54 p.m. PST

"might we imagine the practice of non-violence and non-violent protest as self-rule, as its own escape from tyranny?" Give it a try, I'll keep you covered.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.