Help support TMP


"Mid-Nineteenth Century infantry tactics?" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Top-Rated Ruleset

Mighty Armies: Fantasy


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Acolyte Vampires - Based

The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.


Featured Profile Article

Dung Gate

For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.


Featured Book Review


606 hits since 11 Dec 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Basha Felika11 Dec 2019 12:15 p.m. PST

I'm interested in how European infantry tactics (at Company/battalion level) evolved during the mid-nineteenth century (say, between the Crimean War and the Franco-Prussian) in response to the development of firearms/artillery during the period.

Can anyone point me towards some useful literature?

Lentulus11 Dec 2019 5:12 p.m. PST

This is a good look at Prussia evolving tactics for the mass use of the breachloader.

link

TheOtherOneFromTableScape12 Dec 2019 2:32 a.m. PST

The Osprey Men-at-Arms British Army on Campaign books (MAA193,196,198,201) cover how the British tactics changed. Each book has a section near the front called "Fighting Methods".

cplcampisi12 Dec 2019 7:24 p.m. PST

I recently read Jomini's "The Art of War", a copy of an 1862 translation. It had an appendix about the effect of rifle-muskets on tactics (mainly, he predicted that everybody would go to two ranks, which is basically what happened). But that's mostly before the period you mentioned.

Personal logo McLaddie Supporting Member of TMP12 Dec 2019 10:22 p.m. PST

I can't recommend Wawro's book on the 1866 War. He produces a number of howlers in just the first five pages of the book. I can't trust his accounts of the battles. For instance, throughout the book, he consistently talks about the Austrians attacking in "Half-battalions" when they were still using Division Masses where battalions formed THREE two company 'masses'.

I have yet to read a contemporary account where the Austrians formed 'half-battalions.' He draws a straight line between the French columns used at Valmy [sic] to the Austrians' decision to use column shock tactics when there isn't any such straight line.

There are a number of other real problems with his analysis, and I would be glad to explain. Take the whole thing with a large grain of kosher salt.

Get it from the 'horse's mouth':

Prussian Captain May's criticisms of the Prussian Army in the 1866 war A Tactical Retrospect

and von Molkte's replay written by Colonel Bronsart von Schellendorf:

A Reply to the Prussian Campaign of 1866, A Tactical Retrospect.

Major Albrecht von Boguslawski,Tactical Deductions from the War of 1870-1871

Capt. E.H. Wickham, Influence of Firearms on Tactics 1876

Robert Home Precise of Modern Tactics 1882

And those are just some of the studies on the topic during the 19th Century.

Green Tiger13 Dec 2019 4:17 a.m. PST

Ardant du Picq – worth a read- I think

Basha Felika14 Dec 2019 8:15 a.m. PST

Thank you all, plenty there to investigate

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.