"Battle of the Skull Mound - Reflections" Topic
1 Post
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Blogs of War Message Board Back to the Renaissance Battle Reports Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Renaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article It's probably too late already this season to snatch these bargains up...
Featured Workbench Article wodger  begins his series on how to paint a 15mm DBA army well, in a reasonable time frame.
Featured Profile Article Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
Current Poll
|
Tango01  | 07 Nov 2019 4:07 p.m. PST |
"I promised a look back at the performance of both the Ottoman based infantry force and the Cossack Force which was used in the Skull Mound game. Let's deal with the Ottomans first. We beefed up the quality of the this force in order to achieve a points match with the enemy. This resulted in two Guard quality units – something that rarely if ever happens in the Western theatre but these ratings are relative to their opponents in this battle and not absolute. So, comparing one eight and one twelve model Janissary formation to their opponents, the quality differential between the Raw Ukrainians and the grizzled Turks justified the Guard rating. The other Janissary units received the Veteran rating which was also generous but for the same reason. The irregular infantry were Drilled making the overall quality of the Ottoman Foot vastly superior. This was compounded by providing all Janissaries with flintlocks and providing three field guns…"
Main page
link
Amicalement
Armand |
|
