
"Short Treks Were a Love Letter to the Earnest..." Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Star Trek Message Board
Areas of InterestScience Fiction
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article These Automata infantry need their basing updated.
Featured Profile Article Need post-apocalyptic robots?
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01  | 12 Oct 2019 4:29 p.m. PST |
…, Sometimes Silly Humanity of Classic Star Trek. "This week, Star Trek: Short Treks made its triumphant return for another round of short-form fun, boldly going with not one, but two new episodes. They're bite-sized tales that are packed with heart—an ode to the sometimes camp, often sincere humanity that has driven Star Trek's core of moral sci-fi since its earliest days. The four minisodes released between Discovery's first two seasons all examined different facts of what Star Trek can be as a franchise. It covered the wanderlust of exploration, the human beauty of the far future, the importance of finding common ground for a greater good, and even something as simple as the fact that, yes, this far-flung future of hypercompetent scientists doing cool science can indeed occasionally lighten the hell up…" Main page link Amicalement Armand |
Woolshed Wargamer | 13 Oct 2019 12:47 p.m. PST |
Those short treks are more like short dreks. The review about what I expect from Gizmodo who are nothing more than access media. |
Tango01  | 13 Oct 2019 3:29 p.m. PST |
|
robert piepenbrink  | 13 Oct 2019 3:41 p.m. PST |
I tend to use typos as a good first hack at whether an author paid attention to his writing and at least read the result before posting. This one can't tell "facts" from "facets." |
|