"South Korea Is Considering The Building Of Large" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2016-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article We track down the identity of another mystery Vietnam figure.
Featured Workbench Article Sometimes, you have to take it apart, so you can put it back together again.
Featured Profile Article Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
|
| Tango01 | 12 Oct 2019 3:52 p.m. PST |
…Aircraft Carriers. "As the security situation in the region erodes, the carrier question becomes more pressing for Seoul. A senior South Korean lawmaker has said the country should reconsider proposals for acquiring either light or medium aircraft carriers with Catapult Assisted Take-Off Barrier Arrested Recovery, or CATOBAR, configurations to respond to growing regional security threats. These were alternatives to South Korea's reported decision to purchase a number of large amphibious assault ships capable of supporting fixed-wing short takeoff and vertical landing combat jets, namely the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter. This call for reassessing that choice comes as the South Korean Ministry of Defense may be leaning toward acquiring 20 more conventional F-35A models rather than B variants, further deferring plans to develop a fixed-wing naval aviation capability…"
Main page link Amicalement
Armand |
| Redroom | 13 Oct 2019 6:57 a.m. PST |
With the success NK has had with their small subs, to me it seems like pure idiocrasy building water based assets that can easily be taken out. |
| SBminisguy | 13 Oct 2019 1:57 p.m. PST |
Chest beating – does South Korea have regional or global power projection needs? Not so much. |
| Tango01 | 13 Oct 2019 3:31 p.m. PST |
|
| FatherOfAllLogic | 14 Oct 2019 7:43 a.m. PST |
Whatever for? Are they planning on fighting Japan? Can't the F-35 land at an airport? |
| ROUWetPatchBehindTheSofa | 14 Oct 2019 10:18 a.m. PST |
They already have an amphibious assault ship i.e. helicopter carrier. I could see the sense of them having a couple of littoral carrier vessels to act as moveable airfields in case NK goes off the deep end. Ocean going vessels less so – though given China's increasingly belligerent territorial claims in the region I can see why they might consider the idea. |
| Lion in the Stars | 15 Oct 2019 11:31 a.m. PST |
big-deck gator freighters would be useful to repeat Inchon-type landings. |
|
