"Sekigahara: The Two Hour Battle" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Classical Asian Warfare Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Medieval
Renaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article If you were a kid in the 1960s who loved history and toy soldiers, you probably had a WOW figure!
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Rabelais | 09 Oct 2019 11:20 a.m. PST |
|
| Stever | 22 Nov 2022 11:19 a.m. PST |
That link no longer works. This one does:https://ospreypublishing.com/us/osprey-blog/2019/the-battle-of-sekigahara-what-went-right/ |
| Killerkatanas | 22 Nov 2022 8:55 p.m. PST |
Interesting. I also use Nihon Senshi for it's terrain and orders of battle. They have proven to be, sadly, some of the only sources available, as many of the primary documents were destroyed during the war. However, this story reminds me of the controversy surrounding Nobunaga's use of a 3-rank rotating line of musketeers at Nagashino. Around the turn of the century, new research came out suggesting this was not true, and that Oda instead used 1,000 gunners with 2,000 loaders. |
|
gets medieval.
