Help support TMP


"An electric tank? Army sees multiple advantages ..." Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Team Yankee


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Current Poll


647 hits since 11 Sep 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0111 Sep 2019 10:38 p.m. PST

…in dumping fossil fuels.

"Electric cars are seen by many as an opportunity to reduce carbon emissions, escape the tyranny of rising fossil fuel costs and put an end to trips to the petrol station, but one Australian army major says that the opportunity for Australia's defence forces is mostly pragmatic. And it could save lives.

Major Matthew Wood, a Royal Australian electrical and mechanical engineer currently posted to the Directorate of Land Force Design, Future Land Warfare Branch at Army Headquarters, says it is in the interests of Australia's defence forces to look at electric and autonomous vehicles…."

picture


Main page

link

Amicalement
Armand

Thresher0112 Sep 2019 7:20 a.m. PST

Gonna need a very, very long extension cord for it.

Stryderg12 Sep 2019 10:11 a.m. PST

I imagine they could swap out batteries faster than tanking up with liquid fuel, but how long is it going to take to recharge them? And what kind of range will the batteries provide?

Lion in the Stars12 Sep 2019 10:42 a.m. PST

If you can swap batteries that fast, that means they are easily accessible. And easily accessible means not protected by armor. And then it's going to take all day to recharge those drained batteries.

Look, the battery pack in a Tesla weighs about 1200lbs. it's not easy to move that much weight around, and a tank is going to need probably 10x that much battery, maybe even more. So you're talking about hot-swapping 6+ tons of batteries!

old school diesel-electric (the so-called Series Hybrid), where the diesel turns a generator and an electric motor turns the wheels/tracks is much more reliable and faster to refuel.

Tango0112 Sep 2019 11:27 a.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

jdpintex12 Sep 2019 2:59 p.m. PST

Who's worried about emissions during a war?

I can see it now, air strikes are denied due to emission limits for the day.

Thresher0113 Sep 2019 5:27 p.m. PST

I think what we really need to focus on are explosives that produce little to no smoke and other gases (especially nukes). That is the future of "environmentally-friendly warfare".

Remember, you read it here first.

Major Mike14 Sep 2019 12:24 p.m. PST

I agree with Lion, the hybrid is the way forward. Diesel-electric, hydrogen electric, and/or even plasma electric. Anything that can get the job done, reduce the POL requirements and be cost effective will be welcomed. Autonomous and/or drone's all have to operate in the electromagnetic spectrum and will be subject to interference. As with all good ideas, "Use electric because it helps the environment", sounds nice, but the key is where is the electricity to come from?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.