Help support TMP


"Raising the White Flag (2019)" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

De Bellis Americanus Civilis


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

CSS Mississippi

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian completes a Confederate river ironclad.


Featured Workbench Article

Building the Peter Pig Mortar Schooner

The G Dog Fezian replicates a mortar schooner at Fort Jackson during the New Orleans campaign.


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


636 hits since 6 Sep 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0106 Sep 2019 10:24 p.m. PST

"In this fascinating treatment of a long neglected topic, David Silkenat explores how Civil War-era Americans made sense of surrender as both an idea and practice—as well as how its meaning evolved over the course of the conflict. When the guns fell silent in Charleston Harbor on April 13, 1861, the capitulation of Major Robert Anderson's Fort Sumter garrison not only prevented "the further effusion of blood," but also forged the paradigmatic standard of "honorable surrender" for the duration of the internecine war. Both loyal and secessionist publics expected subsequent commanders facing surrender during the conflict to behave just as Anderson did, fighting desperately until any objective observer would conclude that further resistance was both futile and strategically pointless—all the while keeping their passions in check and scrupulously protecting their personal honor and that of their command by avoiding disgraceful terms. Whether or not any given surrender had in fact been "honorable" was a highly subjective verdict levied retrospectively in the court of public opinion. Absent any formal doctrine governing when or how Civil War officers were to surrender their commands should the unfortunate necessity arise, adhering to the expectations of an unforgiving public proved a perilous exercise for those facing hopeless tactical situations in the field…"

picture

Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

mildbill08 Sep 2019 6:45 a.m. PST

Usually worked but sometimes passions would get out of control in some situations. Fort Pillows is one example. The battle of Pilot Knob is another situation were the Union commander successfully defended when usually he would have surrendered because the Rebel Missouri troops would have killed him personally out of hand. Later that night, the Arkansas troops permitted the garrison to sneak out under the cover of darkness because they knew of the Missourians plans for the Union commander.

Tango0108 Sep 2019 4:55 p.m. PST

Thanks!


Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP10 Sep 2019 2:21 a.m. PST

For once, the publisher's blurb really does attract me to a book. The stats about deaths vs surrender in Pickett's Charge for example. True ACW buffs may have known this for decades…..I make no such claim and certainly did not

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.